Haywood County Commissioners Are At It Again

The Haywood County (NC) Commissioners are at it again. They must have thought people would be mollified by their tabling of the carry restrictions on county property – some of which were illegal – so they have decided to bring up their proposal to regulate “commercial” outdoor shooting ranges.

As I noted in an earlier post, the range of the Haywood County Sheriff’s Department would not meet the standards that the commissioners seem that they can require of “commercial” ranges. This range is also used by the Maggie Valley PD and the Canton PD. I’m not sure where the Clyde PD does their qualifications.

The Waynesville PD uses the Waynesville Police Association range off of Howell Mill Road in Waynesville. This range would most definitely fail the new standards if it was applied to them. My former residence was approximately a mere 100 feet beyond the distance required from the range to an occupied building. Many of my former neighbors would not be so lucky. Moreover, this range fails the 300 foot property line setback requirement.

I find it the height of hypocrisy to require a “commercial” range to jump through multiple hoops that the county by ordinance would exempt themselves from. As the alert from Grass Roots North Carolina makes clear, if you have a backyard private range and you allow a concealed carry instructor to use it, it becomes a “commercial” range. Likewise, if you sponsored an Appleseed shoot, it would become a “commercial” range.

If you live in Haywood County or WNC, if you travel or vacation in Haywood County, or if you just want to express your outrage at the commissioners’ hypocrisy, please read the GRNC alert below and act on it.

VOTE MONDAY COULD RESTRICT RIGHT TO SHOOT ON PRIVATE
PROPERTY

A
public hearing will be held at 5:30 p.m. Monday, April 18th in the
Haywood County
Courtroom of the Historic Courthouse. In late March, the board took
comment on restrictions on display and carry of firearms on county
property and on
a second ordinance restricting “commercial” shooting ranges. In what
might be a deliberate distraction by what many now see as the
“Haywood County Board of Dictators,” however, it appears that the
restrictions on display and carry – which drew outrage from
hundreds of citizens – might have been intended to let the commission
slip through, with minimal opposition, restrictions to shooting on
private
property.
 THE FEINT?
Although the proposed ban on display and carry of firearms Haywood County property appears to have been removed from their
website, you can see it at http://bit.ly/1RA6x1U.
In response to withering opposition, the county seemed to blink in a
March 31 press release saying the ordinance would not be voted on during
their
April 4 meeting. Interestingly, the item has not been returned to the
agenda for the April 18 meeting.
GRNC President Paul Valone spoke against the proposal at a meeting attended by more than 400 GRNC members and county
residents who uniformly opposed it. You can view his remarks in this YouTube Video.
Although the Haywood County manager
attempted to justify the ban by claiming it had been on the books since
1995 and that the county was simply trying to comply with recent changes
to
the law, in truth their proposal would unlawfully ban concealed carry
throughout Allen’s Creek Park.
Rather than justifying prohibitions on lawful citizens protecting themselves against criminals and terrorists, Haywood
County should join 12 other North Carolina counties which have recently removed such restrictions on county property. In a recent editorial,
Robert A. Lovingood, Vice Chair of
the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, responded to the
horrific acts of terrorism in his county by advocating that selected
County employees
and concealed handgun permit holders be allowed to carry on county
property. Rather than sticking their heads in the sand, Haywood County
commissioners should be looking to harden soft targets which are
vulnerable to both criminals and terrorists.
THE REAL POWER GRAB?
The
County Commissioners will vote Monday on an ordinance to define and
restrict “commercial” outdoor shooting
ranges. Unfortunately, if a private property owner were to build even a
rudimentary structure for shooting on his property and then hired a
concealed
handgun instructor to conduct a class on the property for his family —
even once — that property would become a “commercial shooting
range”, requiring him to first obtain a permit from the county.
Say you and a few
friends just share the cost of a private club? Fuggedaboutit. No
exceptions are made for private clubs. If shooting takes place and money
changes
hands, you are the proud owner of a “commercial outdoor shooting range.”
As
the
owner of a “commercial” range, you would be subject to onerous
restrictions, including requirements that shooting stations and targets
be
more than 300 feet from property lines and ¼ mile from occupied
buildings. You would have to build 6 foot fences, post warning signs,
store
firearms and ammunition per BATFE regulations, and restrict shooting to
within stipulated daylight hours. And if you liked those, you’re going
to love this one, straight out of the proposed commercial range
ordinance:
Liability insurance. The permitee [sic] shall be required to carry a minimum of two million dollars ($2,000,000.00
– USA) per occurrence of liability insurance. Such insurance shall name Haywood County as an additional
insured party
and shall
save and hold Haywood County, its elected and appointed officials, and
employees
acting within the scope of their duties harmless from and against all
claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character
,
including
the cost of defense thereof, arising in favor of a person or group’s
members or employees or third parties on the account of any property
damage,
personal injury, or wrongful death arising out of the acts or omissions
of the permittee, his/her group, club, or its agents or
representatives.”

IMMEDIATE ACTION
REQUIRED!

  • EMAIL &
    CALL
    THE HAYWOOD COUNTY
    COMMISSIONERS
    .
    Urge them to vote
    against the gun-ban ordinance. Below, find a copy/paste email list,
    and under ‘Deliver This Message,’ you’ll find a copy/paste email
    message
    to send.

 EMAIL CONTACT INFO
County Commissioners copy/paste email
list

PHONE INFO


MARK S. SWANGER, Chairman                                   
Phone: 828-627-6109 (h)
Cell: 828-507-2315
J. W. “KIRK” KIRKPATRICK, III, Vice
Chairman       
Phone: 828-452-0801 (w)
Fax: 828-452-1861
L. KEVIN ENSLEY,
Commissioner                                                          
Phone: 828-627-3765 (h)
Cell: 828-734-8713
MICHAEL T. SORRELLS, Commissioner                                          
Phone: 828-926-9549 (h)
Cell: 828-506-2174
BILL L. UPTON, Commissioner                              
Phone: 828-648-7469
Cell: 507-2129


ATTEND THE COUNTY COMMISSION
MEETING
THIS MONDAY, APRIL 18. Join GRNC President F. Paul Valone at this critical event. See details below: 


WHEN: 
Monday, April 18, 2016 5:30 PM
WHERE:
Historic Courthouse
Haywood County
Courtroom
215 N. Main St.
Waynesville, NC
HINTS:
Dress for the press! Please no offensive signs, slogans or clothing.
Be sure
to arrive early, as seating may be limited.


DELIVER THIS MESSAGE

Haywood County Commissioners:

I
am outraged by what is either a deception or a
two front power grab being perpetrated by the commission. First, you
tried to restrict concealed carry in Allen’s Creek Park in violation of
state law. And although other restrictions on County property might be
permissible, creating “victim disarmament zones” invariably leads
to predation of the lawful citizens by criminals, sociopaths, and
terrorists. 
Rather
than
justifying prohibitions on lawful citizens protecting themselves
against criminals and terrorists, Haywood County should join 12 other
North
Carolina counties which have recently removed such restrictions on
county property. In a recent editorial, Robert A. Lovingood, Vice Chair
of the San
Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, responded to the horrific acts
of terrorism in his county by advocating that selected county employees
and
concealed handgun permit holders be allowed to carry on county property.
Rather than sticking their heads in the sand, Haywood County
commissioners
should be looking to harden soft targets which are vulnerable to both
criminals and terrorists. 
But
now that proposal appears to be at least temporarily shelved in favor
of onerous restrictions which could prohibit
private property owners from shooting on their land. Under this
proposal, if a private property owner were to build even a rudimentary
structure for
shooting on his property and then hired a concealed handgun instructor
to conduct a class on the property for his family — even once — that
property
would become a “commercial shooting range”, requiring him to first
obtain a permit from the county. 
As
the owner of a “commercial” range, he would be subject to onerous
restrictions, including requirements that
shooting stations and targets be more than 300 feet from property lines
and ¼ mile from occupied buildings. He would have to build 6 foot
fences, post warning signs, store firearms and ammunition per BATFE
regulations, restrict shooting to within stipulated daylight hours, and
pay for $2
million in liability insurance that would indemnify you! 
I demand you immediately
shelf this commercial range proposal, and I will be monitoring your actions through Grass Roots North Carolina alerts. 
Respectfully,

2 thoughts on “Haywood County Commissioners Are At It Again”

  1. Sounds as if your commissioners are all members of CPUSA, or in love with Bloomberg – I wonder if he is financing this debacle? I realize this is scant comfort, but if/when the poo hits the rotating airfoil, you folks in Hayward County will not have to look far to employ leaderless resistance principles. Having local government be supportive of the citizens and of Constitutional principles is about our only recourse to an over-grown Federal government. Hopefully, you and your fellow voters can make some changes in the roster of county commissioners in the near term.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *