The lead plaintiff in the Second Amendment Foundation’s latest suit is Michael Moore. Of course it is not the oafish Hollywood director who is the plaintiff. Rather this Michael Moore is the Superintendent of the Champaign County (IL) Jail. Prior to this, Mr. Moore worked for 30 years as a sworn corrections officer and a deputy sheriff in Cook County. Because Mr. Moore switched from a sworn position to a civilian position, he is no longer allowed to carry a firearm for self-defense in public.<\/p>\n
The Second Amendment Foundation filed their suit yesterday in U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. By happenstance, the judge assigned to this case, Judge Sue Myersclough, is the same judge hearing the Mountain States Legal Foundation’s case, Mishaga v. Monken<\/i>. The lead attorney for this case is David Jensen who is also the lead attorney is the SAF’s suit against the City of New York.<\/p>\n
I will have an analysis of the case up after I get a chance to thoroughly read it.<\/p>\n
BELLEVUE, WA \u2013 The Second Amendment Foundation has filed suit in federal court in Illinois, challenging the state\u2019s complete prohibition on the carrying of firearms in public for the purpose of self-defense.<\/p>\n
The lawsuit alleges that Illinois statutes that completely ban the carrying of handguns for self-defense are \u201cinconsistent with the Second Amendment.\u201d Joining SAF are two private citizens, Michael Moore of Champaign and Charles Hooks of Percy. Named as defendants are Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan and State Police Superintendent Patrick Keen. SAF is represented by attorneys David Jensen and David Sigale. The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois.<\/p>\n
\u201cIllinois is currently the only state in the country that imposes a complete prohibition on the carrying of firearms for personal protection by its citizens,\u201d said SAF Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb. \u201cThe state legislature recently stopped, by a thin margin, a concealed carry measure. After the 2008 Heller ruling and last year\u2019s McDonald ruling against the City of Chicago that incorporated the Second Amendment to the states, one would think that Illinois lawmakers would act quickly to comply with court decisions and the constitution.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIllinois is the only state in the country that completely prohibits its citizens from carrying guns for self-defense,\u201d Jensen added. \u201cIt is incredible that this situation has persisted even in light of the Supreme Court\u2019s rulings in Heller and McDonald, and we look forward to vindicating the rights of the people of Illinois.\u201d <\/p>\n
The lawsuit insists this case is not an attempt to force Illinois into some regulatory scheme, but only to clarify that the state\u2019s current regulatory ban on firearms carry is impermissible under the Second Amendment.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvery other state has some kind of regulatory scenario,\u201d Gottlieb noted. \u201cEven in Wisconsin, where there is no concealed carry statute, the state attorney general has recognized that open carry is legal. Only Illinois makes it statutorily impossible for average private citizens to carry firearms for self-defense. <\/p>\n
\u201cWhether Illinois lawmakers like it or not,\u201d he added, \u201cthe Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is the law of the land. A complete prohibition simply does not pass constitutional muster. The state cannot stick it\u2019s head in the sand and pretend this problem does not exist..\u201d<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n