Help A Gunnie Hit By Fire In Texas

John at Gun Geek Rants is asking for help for a fellow gunnie in Texas.

Unless you have been under a rock or only watch Project Runway marathons on Lifetime, you know that Texas has been suffering under a tremendous series of wildfires. One of the worst is the Bastrop Complex Fire. This fire has destroyed at least 1,500 homes, most of Bastrop State Park, and resulted in 2 fatalities.

Virgil Tripp of Tripp Research and STI fame was one of those who lost his home. However, his business was not hit and is still in operation. John has this suggestion.

My suggestion is that you go buy a part from them. Keep them so busy they don’t have time to think about their house burning down. Besides, haven’t you been looking for an excuse to buy a bulletproof 1911 mag?

The link to Tripp Research is here.

Sounds like a win-win to me. You get top-notch parts and you help out a family hit by a catastrophe. You can see a picture of the wildfire below. To me it looks like what Armageddon must look like.

Brady Campaign Brings In A Head Hunter

The Brady Campaign/Center has brought in executive search firm Korn/Ferry International to help them find their next president. Korn/Ferry International is the world’s largest executive search firm and is a publicly-traded company. These guys don’t work for free. My guess is that to bring in a firm like Korn/Ferry will cost at least $100,000 and probably more.

Kaveman at Days of Our Trailers blog does an excellent job in fisking the Brady’s job announcment. Regarding a couple of the job responsibilities:

“S/he will be expected to create and execute a comprehensive strategy that utilizes a wide range of voices to deliver the organization’s messages.”

Get that? They want a wide range of voices to say what we want them to say. Nice.

“The CEO shall be responsible for effective stewardship of the organization’s existing resources and for identifying and attracting new resources to the Brady Campaign.”

Translation: Must be good enough at dancing in the blood to make people want to pay to watch it.

Sebastian at Snowflakes In Hell does an excellent job at analyzing the Brady Campaign/Center’s stated priority of building the grassroots and notes:

I hate to break to the Bradys but grassroots are generally a bottom up thing, not a top down thing. NRA exists from the bottom up. It did not create its grassroots, it’s grassroots created it (or took it over, more accurately). I don’t predict Brady will have much success in this, because they are going about it wrong. The big disadvantage they have over us is that anti-gun is not a hobby. Shooting is, and one that is practiced by millions of Americans. That gives a natural base of support on which you can build a grassroots-based movement.

This is precisely why the Brady Campaign and Center is having to spend a six-figure sum to find a new CEO and President. They don’t have a farm team at the grassroots with which to build potential future leaders. The local and regional gun control organizations that would normally constitute a farm team are just like the national organization – white, upper-middle class, top-down organizations funded by grant money and not by dues paying members. With regard to their grassroots problem, they remind me of Gertrude Stein’s comment on Oakland, California – “There is no there there.”

The posting by Korn/Ferry International is here and shown below. The other thing this posting does is give a sense of what to expect from the Brady Campaign in terms of activity. Note the programmatic goal of having all guns “child-proofed” by 2015.

COMPANY Posted: Aug 15, 2011
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence

LOCATION
United States

COMPANY BACKGROUND/CULTURE
The Brady Campaign, a non-partisan 501© (4) is the nation’s largest and best-known citizens’ organization working for stronger gun laws. It works at the state and federal levels to prevent gun violence by supporting and defending sensible gun laws, regulations and public policies, mobilizing grassroots activists, electing pro-gun-control public officials and increasing public awareness of the realities of gun violence.

The Brady Campaign is supported by the chapters of its Million Mom March, and thousands of other activists, community leaders, law enforcement officials and ordinary citizens to build coalitions and fight gun violence. The Brady Campaign also has an affiliated Political Action Committee allowing it to be active in federal elections.

The affiliated BradyCenter to Prevent Gun Violence is the legal action, research and education component of the organization. It operates as a 501© (3). Founded in 1983, the Center works to educate the general public about the issues surrounding gun violence in the United States. The Center’s Legal Action Project has been at the forefront of the movement to compel the gun industry to reform its sales and marketing practices. Overall, the Center provides innovative educational and public health solutions to gun violence in our communities.

The Brady Campaign has embraced building this grassroots strength as one of its most important priorities for the years ahead. It has targeted key states and communities in which to concentrate. While it will take time to build, this effort must proceed with urgency. The new President will be expected to take the lead in making this happen.

The organization is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with a staff of 25. There are 5 regional staff members in other parts of the country and the two entities have a combined annual budget of $5.3 million.

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES
The CEO will be a proven, results-oriented manager of people, teams, and organizations. S/He will provide the Brady Campaign with strategic leadership and bear ultimate responsibility for the organization’s programs, operations, and staff. The CEO will oversee effective program delivery and the executive team in its day-to-day management of the organization. S/he will be expected to create and execute a comprehensive strategy that utilizes a wide range of voices to deliver the organization’s messages.

The CEO will report to the Board of Directors on the activities of the organization. The CEO will ensure that the Brady Campaign is a financially sustainable organization by working in partnership with the Board of Directors, the executive team and appropriate staff. The CEO shall be responsible for effective stewardship of the organization’s existing resources and for identifying and attracting new resources to the Brady Campaign.

Additionally, specific objectives include:

Organizational Objectives

•Foster a culture throughout the organization where issues are discussed and resolved, decisions are made, people are assigned responsibility for the achievement of concrete, measurable outcomes and then held accountable for the results.
•Work closely with the senior staff to assess and refine the structures and operating procedures necessary to foster increased collaboration among departments as well as greater decision-making roles for the organization’s senior managers.
•Insure that a plan is executed and results are achieved to increase the diversity of the Board, the staff and the volunteer base of the organization.
•Insure that a wide range of effective voices including Board members, staff and volunteers are assigned to work nationally and in targeted communities throughout the country to make the case for reducing and preventing gun violence.
•With the assistance of the Board and the Development Department expand the involvement of staff and volunteers to raise substantial amounts of money from new and existing major donors, and foundations.
•In cooperation with Development Department staff complete a rigorous review of the direct marketing effort and all development efforts to include planned giving, foundation grants, events and major gifts to insure that the organization is maximizing opportunities for net revenue.
•Insure that the organization is making maximum use of the new technologies to support grassroots organizing, fund raising, sharing of best practices among community based activists and other parts of the movement and communicating the movement’s messages to a broad range of communities.
•Work closely with the Chair of the Board and the Chair of the Nominating Committee to insure that a pool of potential Board members is developed and tested to insure that excellent people are recruited to succeed members whose terms are expiring.

Programmatic Objectives

•Spearhead and actively support the efforts to build a powerful grassroots movement in those states and communities that have initially been targeted for concentration. Insure that metrics and milestones are established and adhered to.
•Lead a process to develop and implement a comprehensive communications strategy that will effectively make the case that gun violence is a pressing public issue, requiring urgent action.
•Develop an action plan to advocate aggressively for sensible gun laws
•Insure that messages resonate and have the desired effect with particular targeted communities and groups and that they are delivered by the most effective messengers over the most appropriate channels.
•Develop strategies to determine and promote evidence-based arguments for public policies, which are grounded in research and support common sense efforts at reducing gun violence.
•Take the lead in building a more unified and broad based movement, linking with other organizations and people with similar interests such as communities of color, groups combating domestic violence, public health, suicide prevention, law enforcement, faith-based organizations as well as other groups devoted to reducing gun violence.
•Build the movement to insure that all guns in our nation are childproofed by 2015.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE / QUALIFICATIONS

The ideal candidate will be an effective and inspiring leader and public representative with a strong commitment to eliminating gun violence. S/he will be expected to make common sense measures to prevent gun violence broadly accepted in our society. S/he will provide organizational and strategic leadership to the board and staff, guiding and integrating Brady’s public education and political programs while driving an ambitious agenda of grassroots expansion and activist mobilization. While no one person will possess all of the qualities enumerated below, the ideal candidate will possess many of the following professional and personal characteristics:

•Experience managing a staff, providing it with clear direction, delegating where appropriate, holding people accountable while assuming the ultimate responsibility for the effective performance of the organization. A person receptive to and not threatened by input and feedback from senior staff and lay leadership.
•A successful track record and a genuine enthusiasm for raising substantial amounts of money from individuals, corporations and foundations.
•A demonstrated commitment to diversity with a record of recruiting and managing a talented and diverse staff. A person who places a high priority on the professional development of staff through delegation of responsibility and collaborative effort.
•Exceptional verbal and written communications skills including experience with both print and electronic media and the new technologies, as well as the ability to serve as the organization’s chief spokesperson, often in the face of public resistance to the organization’s positions.
•An understanding of the application of modern technology for membership development, fundraising, public education, lobbying and organizational management.
•A background in the design and management of legislative agendas, grassroots organizing and public education programs.
•Experience, working effectively in a bipartisan fashion with a variety of constituencies–other organizations, community leaders, elected officials, current and future funders and the media.
•Experience working with or serving as a member of a lively and highly engaged non-profit Board of Directors.
•A deep seated commitment to the prevention of gun violence.
•A leader who can articulate a vision, communicate organizational priorities as well as inspire and motivate people to work hard in the pursuit of a mission.
•A strategic and creative thinker with the organizational skills necessary to insure that strategies are implemented and objectives are achieved.
•A person with excellent political skills, who is comfortable with controversy and diversity and who will be able to balance, negotiate, network and build coalitions among diverging and competing points of views, both within the organization and outside it.
•A good listener who inspires trust and confidence and remains open to the ideas of others.
•The capacity and desire to develop a rapport with a wide variety of persons, volunteers, victims, all levels of staff and lay leadership.
•A high level of energy, an ability to work long hours and a willingness to travel throughout the country.
•Unimpeachable integrity.
•A sense of humor.
EDUCATION
An undergraduate degree is required. A graduate degree is highly preferred.

COMPENSATION
The competitive compensation package will be offered to attract outstanding candidates.

Video Of Walgreen’s Pharmacist Defending Himself

Jeremy Hoven was a pharmacist for Walgreens in Benton Township, Michigan. I say was because Walgreens fired him by e-mail a week after he defended himself and the store’s staff from a pair of armed robbers back in May.

Mr. Hoven has filed a wrongful termination suit against Walgreens. Mr. Hoven’s attorney, Peter Kosick, released to the media the surveillance tape of the event and ABC News has made it available.

As the tape clearly shows, Mr. Hoven was in the process of calling 9-1-1 when one of the robbers jumped over the counter and pointed a gun at him. It was only then that he drew his weapon and fired upon the robber.

Peter Kosick of St. Joseph, Hoven’s attorney, tells ABC News that, in his opinion, Walgreens should have commended his client for bravery. That, too, is the opinion of township police Lt. Delman Lange, who, after reviewing the surveillance video, told the local paper, “If it was me, I would have done the same thing.”

However, Walgreens disputes that Mr. Hoven should have protected himself along with the other employees in the store.

Though Hoven was licensed by the state of Michigan to carry a gun, Walgreen discourages its pharmacists from packing pistols. A spokeswoman for the drug chain told ABC News in an email that while Walgreens would not be able to disclose its policies, they were written to protect the safety of customers and employees. “Store employees receive comprehensive training on our robbery procedures and how to react and respond,” she wrote. Walgreens’ approach is “endorsed by law enforcement, which strongly advises against confrontation of crime suspects. Compromise is safer.”

While Walgreens says compromise is safer, the question is for whom? The employee or the company and their insurance company? I plan to stick with my decision made back in May to not give my patronage to Walgreens.

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

H/T Stephen Wenger

UPDATE:  ABC’s Good Morning America gave the story quite a bit of air time this morning. They even brought in one of their legal reporters to discuss the lawsuit. He made the point that even if they can prove that Mr. Hoven knew of the “non-escalation” policy, it seems like “a stupid time to enforce it.”

Quote Of The Day

Mark Steyn is a Canadian who gets it as does Canadian blogger Kathy Shaidle.

What’s missing from these commemorations?

Firemen?

Oh, please. There are some pieces of the puzzle we have to leave out. As Mayor Bloomberg’s office has patiently explained, there’s “not enough room” at the official Ground Zero commemoration to accommodate any firemen. “Which is kind of weird,” wrote the Canadian blogger Kathy Shaidle, “since 343 of them managed to fit into the exact same space ten years ago.”

I find this especially poignant since my second cousin Kevin McEntyre is a New York City fireman, who by the grace of God, had gone off duty that morning and was on his way home when the terrorists hit the World Trade Center. Many in his fire company were not so lucky and were among the 343 that died that day. Kevin spent many days afterwards at Ground Zero searching for survivors and then for the bodies of the dead.

Just Rubs Me The Wrong Way

I’m not ethnocentric nor do I believe the United States has always been right in everything it has done pre and post-9/11. I think the Patriot Act has become an assault on civil liberties under color of law and I think the TSA is an abomination.

Still this tripe by a Canadian business and current affairs columnist just rubs me the wrong way. David Olive of the Toronto Star wrote a column entitled “I’m already nauseated by the 9/11 memorializing” a few days ago which included this.

After all, it was a panicked response to 9/11 that conflated that terrorist attack into the nation-defining episode Osama bin Laden intended, unleashing the dogs of war on innocent people, stripping Americans of basic civil rights, degrading America’s military prowess and its public finances, and exposing the U.S. to the world as maladroit, mendacious and belligerent in diplomacy; incompetent at military occupation; inept in the gathering and interpretation of intelligence; and having only a lip-service commitment to the eradication of torture from the world. (I assumed, cynically, that the U.S. would at least bring its own WMDs to plant if it couldn’t find any of Saddam’s, in the manner of a trigger-happy LAPD equpped with “drop guns” for use when accidentally making widows in South Central LA.)

Issa-Grassley Letter Demands Info From White House On Project Gunwalker

Sharyl Attkisson reported a few minutes ago that Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) have sent a letter today to National Security Advisor Thomas Donilon requesting e-mails and other information from three current or former White House staffers.

The staffers are: Kevin O’Reilly, former Director of North American Affairs, National Security Council; Dan Restrepo, Special Assistant to the President, National Security Council; and Greg Gatjanis, Director for Terrorist Finance and Counternarcotics, Counterterrorism Policy, National Security Council.

The information requests were made after revelations that ATF’s Special Agent in Charge of Phoenix during Fast and Furious, William Newell, “provided regular updates to Kevin O’Reilly” at the White House…”as early as the summer of 2010.” The emails indicate O’Reilly asked to share information about Fast and Furious with Restrepo and Gatjanis.

In addition to the new documents request, the Congressional Republicans also requested to interview O’Reilly by the end of this month.

The White House is denying all prior knowledge of Operation Fast and Furious according to a statement from an “unnamed” White House official.

“As has already been reported, the emails referenced in this letter affirm that no one at the White House knew about the investigative tactics being used in the operation, let alone any decision to let guns walk. To the extent that some NSS staffers were briefed on the toplines of ongoing federal efforts, so were members of Congress. The Washington Post reported that House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa received a Fast and Furious briefing in April of 2010. These types of top-line briefings would not include a discussion of the investigative tactics like gun-walking. These e-mail exchanges show nothing more than an effort to give local color to a policy initiative that was designed to give more resources to help with the border problem. They don’t even contain the name “Fast and Furious” until February 2011, after the indictment was unsealed.”

If you have been following Mike Vanderboegh’s reports on Sipsey Street Irregulars, you know that he has had Dan Restrepo in his sights since the Spring. Today he gave some more background on him from his time as a staffer for former Rep. Lee Hamilton. As Mike notes about Restrepo’s reputation,

He has been described by sources who know him as “ruthless,” “amoral,” and a “f-cking political thug” who would “sell his mother or stab his father” if he thought he could thereby get ahead.

Just the kind of loyal political functionary to carry out a sensitive, secret operation like the Gunwalker Plot.

House Judiciary Committee Schedules Hearings On HR 822

The House Judiciary Committee has finally scheduled hearings on HR 822 – the National Right-To-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011.

9/13/2011

Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security

10:00 a.m. in the 2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Hearing on: H.R. 822, the “National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011”

By Direction of the Chairman

The bill introduced in February by Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL) and Rep. Heath Shuler (D-NC) has 242 co-sponsors. The text of the bill and more info can be found here.

The recent campaign by the NRA-ILA to get people to call their Congressman seems to have had an impact. The bill has languished for months now without a hearing. This could also mean there is enough support in the Senate to get it passed this time. If so, it will be interesting to see what will happen if it gets to the President’s desk.

Beretta Joins The Micro-Nine Club With The Nano

Beretta has joined the micro-nine club with their new pistol, the Nano. I am a bit surprised that a pistol from an Italian company has such Austro-Germanic lines. It has none of the traditional Beretta soft lines or “curviness” of either the Model 92 or the PX4.

From Beretta’s press release:

ACCOKEEK, MARYLAND — Beretta USA confirms recent internet rumors regarding its entry into the pocket 9mm pistol category with the introduction of the Beretta BU-9 Nano. Initial shipments of the much anticipated American-made pistol are slated to leave the Accokeek, Maryland factory beginning late October, and with a suggested retail price of $475, this next evolution pocket pistol will be hard to resist.

Unlike traditional pistols the serial number on the Nano is found not on the frame, but on the stainless steel sub-chassis. This distinct difference makes the BU-9 Nano truly modular, providing customers the opportunity to easily change the techno-polymer grip frame from a full size pistol, to a compact, to a sub-compact or to a color other than black, all with a single serial number. The modularity of the Nano provides the option of customization and extends beyond the frame to its interchangeable sights and ambidextrous magazine release button. Owners no longer need the services of a gunsmith to change the front and rear sights, a simple hex screw allows for a host of sight options and adjustments; while left-handed shooters will appreciate the Nano’s ambi mag release, an exclusive feature in the pocket pistol category.

Second to customization, the Nano’s modularity provides for simple disassembly and easy cleaning. Safely disassemble the pistol by first engaging the striker deactivator, a patent pending safety mechanism that eliminates the need to pull the trigger prior to disassembly. A low-profile, snag free design completes the Nano and makes it easy to carry, draw from concealment and holster, mandatory features for any pocket pistol.

Launching simultaneously, the new Nano microsite showcases the distinct features and benefits that make this pistol the perfect handgun choice for everyday conceal carry. As the BU-9 Nano family grows, customers will find the latest news, model comparisons, informational videos and the latest advertising campaigns, all contained in one easy to navigate website. For now, visit www.berettanano.com to learn what makes the Beretta BU-9 Nano an instant contender in the pocket 9mm category.

H/T Outdoor Wire

Knife Rights Report On Boston Hearing

The hearing on a proposed requirement that business that sell knives have a special license was held last night. Knife Rights was represented by Jim Wallace, Executive Director of the Gun Owners’ Action League.
The report on the hearing is below.

Boston City Council Holds Knife Control Hearing

On Thursday, September 8, 2011, the Public Safety Committee of the Boston City Council held a public hearing concerning the potential licensing of businesses that sell knives. According to the supporters of the proposed license, the action is needed as a means to address the “ever increasing knife violence in Boston.” Knife Rights was represented by Jim Wallace, Executive Director of Gun Owners’ Action League, who was also representing his own organization.

The politicians attending were clearly firm in their conviction that action must be taken, some scapegoat must be found. There were grieving parents and their genuine heart wrenching stories of lost loved ones. Public safety officials offered supportive testimony for the proposal. For anyone who attended the infamous Gun Control hearings here a decade ago, the only difference was that the word “guns” was replaced with “knives.”

The testimony and statements during the public hearing were frighteningly reminiscent of past gun control hearings. “Why would we allow any corner store to sell these dangerous weapons (knives).” “Selling knives does not support families.” “We must do everything we can to restrict access to these dangerous weapons.” “Why would anyone need a knife with a blade more than two inches long.””Knives are fine if you need them for work, but employers should require they be left on the job.”

To anyone who has been involved in the Second Amendment battle in the last few decades it sends a shiver up your spine, because this is exactly how gun control efforts were initiated. To make matters more frightening, law enforcement officials testified that “the modern way of approaching these issues is to go after the source of the items rather than the criminals themselves.”

Wallace urged the City Council to take careful and meaningful steps in addressing the problem of violent crime. “I urge the City Council to review what it is about to do and reflect on the failures of gun control,” said Wallace. “Over a decade ago I had to testify before committees in the state house with grieving families in the background. Now I sit before you a decade later with grieving families behind me again. If you proceed down this path and get it wrong again, ten years from now we will likely repeat this scene yet again.”

Wallace also reminded the councilors that these stores are already licensed by the city, for which they pay a fee and are subject to city oversight as to their compliance with the law, and that there is already an ordinance on the books that makes it illegal to sell a knife with a blade two inches or longer to anyone under age 18. He reiterated that there is no need for new regulation.

Even in high security of prisons rudimentary knives (shivs) are readily available, which shows the futility of trying to control the source of a such an easy to make weapon, as opposed to penalizing law-abiding citizens and making it more difficult for them to obtain the versatile tools used by millions every day at work, home and while recreating.

The City Council took no action on the matter during the hearing. It is likely that it will be some weeks before a draft ordinance is presented to the City Council as a whole.

In the meantime, we will work to try to ensure that history does not repeat itself. We have an unusual advantage in this situation to know what the future will bring if we follow this path of knife control proposed by Boston. We know without any doubt that citizens’ rights will be trampled. Most certainly grieving families will still be burying loved ones because politicians would appear to prefer going after the source of an inanimate object rather than the human criminal element – the source of the crime. The solution offered up today is no solution at all.

If you are a Boston citizen, here is a link to the councilors’ webpages where you can find a link to contact them and POLITELY express your outrage: http://www.cityofboston.gov/citycouncil/councillors

We urge all Boston area Knife Rights members to contact the Boston City Council and express their opposition to this measure.