A
public hearing will be held at 5:30 p.m. Monday, April 18th in the
Haywood County
Courtroom of the Historic Courthouse. In late March, the board took
comment on restrictions on display and carry of firearms on county
property and on
a second ordinance restricting “commercial” shooting ranges. In what
might be a deliberate distraction by what many now see as the
“Haywood County Board of Dictators,” however, it appears that the
restrictions on display and carry – which drew outrage from
hundreds of citizens – might have been intended to let the commission
slip through, with minimal opposition, restrictions to shooting on
private
property.
THE FEINT?
Although the proposed ban on display and carry of firearms Haywood County property appears to have been removed from their
website, you can see it at http://bit.ly/1RA6x1U.
In response to withering opposition, the county seemed to blink in a
March 31 press release saying the ordinance would not be voted on during
their
April 4 meeting. Interestingly, the item has not been returned to the
agenda for the April 18 meeting.
GRNC President Paul Valone spoke against the proposal at a meeting attended by more than 400 GRNC members and county
residents who uniformly opposed it. You can view his remarks in this YouTube Video.
Although the Haywood County manager
attempted to justify the ban by claiming it had been on the books since
1995 and that the county was simply trying to comply with recent changes
to
the law, in truth their proposal would unlawfully ban concealed carry
throughout Allen’s Creek Park.
Rather than justifying prohibitions on lawful citizens protecting themselves against criminals and terrorists, Haywood
County should join 12 other North Carolina counties which have recently removed such restrictions on county property. In a recent editorial,
Robert A. Lovingood, Vice Chair of
the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, responded to the
horrific acts of terrorism in his county by advocating that selected
County employees
and concealed handgun permit holders be allowed to carry on county
property. Rather than sticking their heads in the sand, Haywood County
commissioners should be looking to harden soft targets which are
vulnerable to both criminals and terrorists.
THE REAL POWER GRAB?
The
County Commissioners will vote Monday on an ordinance to define and
restrict “commercial” outdoor shooting
ranges. Unfortunately, if a private property owner were to build even a
rudimentary structure for shooting on his property and then hired a
concealed
handgun instructor to conduct a class on the property for his family —
even once — that property would become a “commercial shooting
range”, requiring him to first obtain a permit from the county.
Say you and a few
friends just share the cost of a private club? Fuggedaboutit. No
exceptions are made for private clubs. If shooting takes place and money
changes
hands, you are the proud owner of a “commercial outdoor shooting range.”
As
the
owner of a “commercial” range, you would be subject to onerous
restrictions, including requirements that shooting stations and targets
be
more than 300 feet from property lines and ¼ mile from occupied
buildings. You would have to build 6 foot fences, post warning signs,
store
firearms and ammunition per BATFE regulations, and restrict shooting to
within stipulated daylight hours. And if you liked those, you’re going
to love this one, straight out of the proposed commercial range
ordinance:
“Liability insurance. The permitee [sic] shall be required to carry a minimum of two million dollars ($2,000,000.00
– USA) per occurrence of liability insurance. Such insurance shall name Haywood County as an additional
insured party and shall
save and hold Haywood County, its elected and appointed officials, and
employees
acting within the scope of their duties harmless from and against all
claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character,
including
the cost of defense thereof, arising in favor of a person or group’s
members or employees or third parties on the account of any property
damage,
personal injury, or wrongful death arising out of the acts or omissions
of the permittee, his/her group, club, or its agents or
representatives.”
|