by I wrote about the troll Seth Haan the other day because of his attack on Jeff Knox. An astute reader who took the time to go back through some of his posts on the 24 Hour Campfire Forum noticed something interesting. Look at the next few screen captures and see if you see it.
You will notice “Seth” consistently used the first person plural when referring to the Board of Directors as well as the old guard’s slate of candidates. As in, “the recent reforms we supported” and “we need to keep our members”, etc.
Is “Seth” a mere pen name or nom de plume for a member of the Board of Directors that is supporting the cabal? If you were talking about others in a group that didn’t include yourself, you would use “they” or the third person plural and not “we” which is the first person plural.
“Seth” consistently ignores requests to identify himself in the various forums. There is never something like “I’m just a concerned member” or the like. He did say he had met a number of Board members at events put on by the NRA and, interestingly enough, SAF.
It is obvious that “Seth” doesn’t like Jeff Knox as he once again attacked him in a post on the Smith & Wesson Forum today. As for those of us running on the reform slate, you can see for yourself his opinion of me and my fellow reformers.
If I were an opportunist, I would have sucked up to the old regime years ago so as to get on the Board and get rewarded with African safaris for my loyalty. As it is, my two trips to South Africa last year were paid for out of my own pocket and I consider it money well spent. I guess I just don’t know how to properly play the role of an opportunist.
So if you are reading this “Seth”, let us know who you really are. Enquiring minds want to know.