Uncategorized

Colt And Florida

August 6, 2013 by 3 Comments

Back in late 2011, Colt’s Manufacturing Company indicated that it planned to open a plant in Kissimmee, Florida. They said they were going to make a $2.5 million investment in a vacant facility that was owned by Osceola County. While the plant was scheduled to open in 2012, it never did.

Fast forward to today. At today’s Regular Meeting of the Osceola County Board of Commissioners, the Board gave their unanimous approval and authorization for the Board Chair and Vice-Chair to sign the landlord agreement with Colt’s Manufacturing. The lease will run through 2023. This agreement was necessary before the equipment lessor would allow Colt’s Manufacturing to move any machinery into the building.

While Colt has committed to this plant since 2011, I don’t believe any mention has been made of just what will be made or assembled in this plant. Given Connecticut’s new gun control laws, I would not be surprised to see the plant being used for the assembly of AR-15s for the civilian market. However, that is just a guess.

WFTV Channel 9 Orlando has a report on Colt moving in along with the positive reaction by area residents.

H/T Miguel

Uncategorized

No Research Like Misleading Research

August 5, 2013 by

When it comes to recommending studies on firearms dealers, regulation, and gun sales to journalists, the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy at Harvard’s Kennedy School is consistent. Consistently bad and consistently biased, that is.

When you see journal articles referenced that have been authored by the likes of Garen Wintemute of UC Davis’ Violence Prevention Research Program , Daniel Webster of  Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and David Hemenway of the Harvard School of Public Health, you know that they have an agenda and that agenda is anti-gun.

And then there is this:

Finally, media outlets such as the New York Times continue to investigate the various mechanisms by which guns are sold on the Internet, often with little oversight or rules in place (also see Wired magazine’s explainer on the issue).

Really? The New York Times? A paper that has never seen a restrictive gun law that it didn’t like unless it was a more restrictive one? As to little oversight and no rules for Internet sales of firearms, these “investigations” totally ignore Federal law that mandates interstate sales must go through a FFL and get a NICS check.

Never let it be said that facts got in the way of promoting an anti-gun agenda at Harvard.

Uncategorized

Ways To Spend A Rainy Afternoon

August 4, 2013 by 3 Comments

There are many different ways you could spend a rainy afternoon.

You could curl up with a good book.

The rain on the roof could make a nap even more enjoyable.

Or, you could shoot a full-auto Thompson submachine gun.

This past Wednesday, Sean Sorrentino and I did the last on the list. Thanks to one of Sean’s readers, artist Guy Smalley, we had a great time with Guy’s Thompson Model 1928 W.H. We also shot a number of other rifles and pistols but the Thompson was the highlight of the afternoon. You can see Guy holding his Thompson with its 50-round drum magazine below. Sean has posted a video of him loading the drum magazine. Through the wonders of editing, it came out OK despite me being the one taking the video.

Due to the weight of the Thompson plus the Cutts compensator, the Thompson at full auto is very controllable. The muzzle didn’t rise that much and it was very easy to keep on target regardless of whether you were firing in short bursts or letting it run.

Some of the other firearms we had available to shoot range from Sean’s Templar Custom AR-15 to my IBM M-1 Carbine to a whole ton of Guy’s firearms. You can see some of the assortment in the next two pictures.

Table 1
Table 2

Unfortunately, we didn’t have time enough to fire everything but we did get to fire quite an assortment.

We ended the afternoon firing Guy’s AR-50 .50 BMG rifle. The muzzle break reduced the felt recoil tremendously. It kicked less than the Mosin-Nagant Model 44 pictured above. They both tore some big divots into the hillside in which we were shooting.

One of the more interesting aspects of the afternoon is that Guy and I live less than a 5 minute drive apart but had never met before even though we live in a little town. I think we’ll be doing some more shooting together in the future.

I want to thank both Sean and Guy for providing great company on a wet afternoon.

Uncategorized

Interesting Graphic On Gun Sales

August 2, 2013 by 2 Comments

A stock investing website, The Wall Street Cheat Sheet, had an article yesterday discussing the financial results for Ruger. The author of the article was looking at the impact of proposed gun control laws on gun sales.

The law of unintended consequences is hitting its mark with politicians and gun owners. Amid a push for tighter gun control laws over the past year, an increase in firearm sales is boosting the nation’s leading gun manufacturer.

 The article concluded that the big push for gun control post-Newtown was a big factor in the growth of gun sales.

The graphic below is from a presentation that Smith and Wesson made to stock analysts. It plots the monthly NICS checks for each calendar year from 2008 to the present.

And then there is this:

According to an analysis of the gun industry by the Associated Press, the federal government has conducted roughly the same number of background checks for gun owners and prospective buyers under Obama’s first term, as it did under George W. Bush’s first six years of presidency. For the first time since 1993, the number of federally licensed retail gun dealers in the U.S. increased in 2010 and 2011, adding 1,167 more licensed dealers.

I guess Obama really is the world’s best gun salesman. 

Uncategorized

News On The Business Of Guns

August 2, 2013 by

There are a number of news items from the last few days regarding the firearms industry that are worthy of attention.

First, ArmaLite of Geneseo, Illinois was bought out by Strategic Armory Corps (SAC) of Phoenix, Arizona. SAC was formed in 2011 as an acquisition vehicle with which to buy out firearms and firearms related companies. In addition to ArmaLite, SAC owns high-end tactical bolt-rifle maker Surgeon Rifles, suppressor maker AWC Systems Technology, and AWC Ammo. The head of SAC had this to say on the acquisition.

“ArmaLite is a tremendous addition to our group of outstanding companies and broadens our product line so we can better meet the needs of our customers”, said Mark Johnson, SAC President and CEO. “The history of Mark Westrom over his 19 years of leading ArmaLite will provide a wealth of industry knowledge to our leadership team and allow us to further expand our ability to meet the ever increasing demands for the highest quality products by our customers and the marketplace.”

News comes that longtime tactical and military equipment retailer US Cavalry which declared bankruptcy in March has been purchased by ERMC Corporation of Chattanooga, TN.

US Cavalry Retail Ownership Announcement

Chattanooga based ERMC Corporation, the parent company of Modern Firearms and ASR Uniforms announced today the acquisition of U. S. Cavalry Stores. ERMC purchased all U. S. Cavalry assets to include personnel, inventory and retail stores. I will be working with others in the company to integrate Modern Firearms, ASR Uniforms and U.S. Cavalry into a top notch provider of Military, Police, Fire and EMS uniforms, equipment and firearms.

Public companies are starting to report their sales and profits for the second quarter. Both ATK and Ruger reported their sales and earnings in the last couple of days.

ATK’s business is composed of three segments: aerospace group, defense group, and the sporting group. For me, it is the sporting group of companies that is of the most interest. While the overall sales for ATK were flat for the second quarter of 2013, the sporting group saw a 28.4% increase or $79,346,000. In terms of profit, the sporting group led ATK with a 112.2% increase compared to a single digit increase for the aerospace group and a loss for their defense group. This increase from the sporting group allowed them to beat stock analysts’ expectations of profits.

With the purchase of Savage Arms, the sporting group is now more than just ammo, reloading components and equipment, and other firearms related accessories. It appears that the company leadership also recognizes the importance of Savage to their bottom line. ATK’s President and CEO Mark DeYoung had this to say about Savage.

“The Company’s completion of the Savage acquisition builds upon strong Sporting Group performance and market leadership with a well-respected and recognized brand in the long guns market. We are well underway with the integration of Savage and I am confident our wholesalers, retailers, distributors and consumers will find value in our robust portfolio of product offerings.”

 Ruger had another stellar quarter. Their earnings increased 79% for the second quarter when compared to the same quarter a year earlier. The earnings increase was driven by a 50% increase in sales for the quarter compared to a year earlier. Sales for the quarter were $179.5 million and the earnings per share were $1.63 per share. Both of these numbers blew away analysts’ expectations. Ruger was forecast to have earned $1.18 per share in profits on sales of $154.7 million.

New product sales accounted for 31% of sales in the quarter. New introductions include both the LC380 and SR45 pistols.

Ruger expects to spend upwards of $35 million on capital expenditures during 2013. Much of that will be related to new products and production capacity expansion. I’m sure part of that money will go to getting the Mayodan plant up and running after the expansion plans are finalized. The company is waiting on the tax incentives and grants package from North Carolina to be completed.

CEO Mike Fifer held a conference call today to discuss the company’s second quarter results. Fifer said he expected the third quarter to slow down as things start to return to more normal growth. As reported by CNN Money:

While the trend continued in the second quarter, Ruger CEO Mike Fifer said gun demand appears to be returning to “more normalized growth rates.”

“We haven’t seen any slowing in demand for Ruger products,” Fifer told analysts during a conference call. “But we have heard anecdotally that the normal seasonal slowdown is starting.”

He said sales in the current quarter could represent a “reset from the huge surge” that began late last year.

He was also asked about the damage to the Prescott plant. He said he thinks the total cost to Ruger will be less than $5 million in terms of damage to the roof, equipment, and lost production. They resumed production on Monday. The machinery that got soaked was not being used in current production and was intended for future projects.

Fifer was asked about the new Mayodan plant and what was needed to get it ready. He said that with the exception of adding a section for bluing and for heat treating they only needed to move in the new machinery. He was very complimentary towards the workforce in the Rockingham County area. He said the caliber of the potential employees was “really impressive.” He said the firearms to be produced in Mayodan would be new introductions so he couldn’t discuss what they were yet.

If the overall market demand is starting to slow, I’m going to go out on a limb and say we should expect to see a number of new product introductions from not only Ruger but the rest of the industry. SHOT 2014 should be interesting in that regard.

UPDATE: Steve at The Firearm Blog listened in on the ATK conference call for analysts. He has a review of it here. A couple of points from his review. First, Savage Arms is expected to make ATK around $25-28 million in profits. Second, Steve believes that ATK is in the market to pick up other firearms companies.

Uncategorized

John Morse: Guns And Gun Control? Hey, Look Over There – Squirrel!

August 1, 2013 by 1 Comment

The one thing Colorado Senate President John Morse (D-Colorado Springs) does not want to talk about is the one thing that has him facing a recall election in September. That is namely Morse’s votes for gun control and the role he played in shoving gun control through the Colorado State Senate.

As the Denver Post notes:

The reason Senate President John Morse faces a recall election that could end his political career is simple: He’s from a swing district, and he supported controversial gun-control laws.

But in the days since the recall battle began in earnest after a July filled with legal spats, Morse and a group backing the El Paso County senator — A Whole Lot of People for John Morse — have unveiled a strategy focused on everything but his gun votes.

Below is his campaign’s first TV ad. Notice that he is blaming “groups in Denver” rather than the grassroots efforts of local gun owners for the recall. Notice also that he says he wants to bring more jobs to Colorado despite the impact the gun control laws he pushed have had on the Colorado economy.

You have to wonder if Morse survives the recall effort  will he credit New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg for providing the financial resources need to fund ads like the one above. After all, Bloomberg has indicated he plans to support both Morse and Sen. Angela Giron (D-Pueblo) in their fight to remain in office.

Uncategorized

Safe Restaurants Project

July 31, 2013 by 2 Comments

In response to anticipated efforts by the gun prohibitionists, Grass Roots North Carolina is launching the Safe Restaurants Project. As the release below makes clear, it is an effort to encourage restaurant owners to NOT post their restaurants against concealed carry.

From the GRNC release:

Gun Group Targets Restaurants

GRNC ‘Safe Restaurants Project’ will admonish gun rights supporters to report restaurants which post against concealed handguns

Recently signed by Governor Pat McCrory, on October 1st House Bill 937 will expand North Carolina’s concealed handgun law into restaurants. Under the statute, restaurants may still elect to post signs prohibiting firearms.

Although concealed handgun permit-holders will still be prohibited from imbibing alcohol, gun control advocates are already planning to pressure restaurants to prohibit concealed carry.

Accordingly, and with great reluctance, GRNC is responding with its “GRNC Safe Restaurants Project,” to ensure the new law will provide its intended deterrent to violent crime.

The 3 objectives of the “GRNC Safe Restaurants Project”:

  • Provide education for concealed handgun permit-holders to avoid accidental violations;

  • Provide “Protection Preferred” signage enabling supporting restaurants to subtly identify their support to permit-holders and supporters; and

  • Create a “Restaurant “Don’t Buy List” which:

  • Allows thousands of gun owners to report posted restaurants;


  • Sends restaurants notification they have been reported and requests them to remove signs or inform GRNC that a mistake has been made;

  • Provides contact information for posted restaurants, enabling thousands of supporters to contact those restaurants to explain that they will not patronize posted establishments.

GRNC will distribute Restaurant Don’t Buy lists and relevant materials to tens of thousands of gun owners via:

  • GRNC’s email alert network, comprising 87,000 supporters;


  • Gun shows in Asheville, Hickory, Charlotte, Winston-Salem, Lexington, Concord, Greensboro, Raleigh, Fayetteville and Jacksonville;

  • GRNC’s distribution network of nearly 50 gun shops;

  • Concealed handgun permit classes statewide; and

  • GRNC’s highly popular website.

Said GRNC president Paul Valone:

“It’s unfortunate GRNC must counter gun control activists’ attempts to undermine a law intended to deter restaurant crime and save lives. We fully sympathize with restaurant owners caught in the middle of a battle we’d rather not fight, but they should understand that, according to the Pew Research Center, gun rights supporters donate four times more and are more politically involved than gun control advocates. They should ask themselves whether they want to alienate the 399,268 North Carolinians who have applied for concealed handgun permits.”

This brings to mind a suggestion made many times by Tom Gresham when coming across a store or restaurant that is posted against concealed carry. Tom calls the establishment and says to the manager, “I wanted to shop (or eat) at your store (restaurant) but it was unsafe.”  When they ask what you mean, you tell them they have posted against concealed carry and you won’t subject your family to the risk. Then you tell them what you spent at their competitors. To really get the point across, you fax them a copy of your receipt from their competitor. Done often enough, it will get the message across.

Uncategorized

One Of The Pro-Gun Extremists Behind The Recall? Not Quite

July 30, 2013 by 2 Comments

Given that the gun prohibitionists don’t know astroturf from the real grassroots, it is not surprising that the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence is proclaiming Dudley Brown as “one of the pro-gun extremists behind the recall of CO State Senate President John Morse.” The Dudley Brown in question is the head of the National Association for Gun Rights and the Rocky Mountain Gun Owners.

One of the men behind the recall of Morse and Giron? Not quite.

From the Denver Post in April when talk of a recall first surfaced:

Dudley Brown, director of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, thinks the time and money would be better spent taking out Democrats in swing districts in the 2014 election.

From the Colorado politics website, Colorado Peak Politics, which posted this yesterday:

Neither the NRA nor Rocky Mountain Gun Owners did diddly squat to get the recalls on the ballot. These recalls, and most especially the Giron effort, were grassroots at their most raw.

 From the Denver Post’s The Spot blog which said this of Brown yesterday:

In April, as two recall efforts were already underway and there was talk of recalling Gov. John Hickenlooper and other Democrats, Brown said he wasn’t so sure recalling the politicians was the best strategy. He told The Denver Post then he thought the money would be better spent taking out Democrats in swing districts in the 2014 election.

From The Gazette of Colorado Springs in a feature on the grassroots organizers behind the recalls:

The four men behind the Colorado State Senate recalls on Friday laughed sardonically at the suggestion that outside interests – namely the GOP and NRA – are driving their campaigns to unseat four Democratic lawmakers.

“I think some people clamored for some help at the beginning,” said Victor Head, who led the successful campaign to force a recall election of Sen. Angela Giron, D-Pueblo. “They said ‘where’s the heavy hitters, where is the big interest in this, this has national implications’ and they never showed up.”

 Have Dudley Brown and NAGR finally stepped up for the recall fight? Yes, they have as of late yesterday when they began running a 30 second spot seen here in the Colorado Springs TV market.

I’m glad to see Dudley Brown finally step up to the plate. However, to call him one of the people behind the recall is to totally diminish the hard work done on the ground by the actual grassroots activists like Victor Head of Pueblo, Tim Knight of Durango, Anthony Garcia of Brighton and Grand Junction attorney Erik Groves who organized the Basic Freedom Defense Fund.

Uncategorized

Welcome To The Party, Guys!

July 30, 2013 by 6 Comments

The average Californian who wants to own a firearm especially a handgun has to deal with a whole host of rules and regulations that are enough to make your head swim. Now, in what can only be termed schadenfreude, so too must Federal law enforcement officers stationed in the state of California.

California Attorney General Kamala Harris, deemed by Obama to be “the best looking attorney general in the country”, has changed the policy of the Department of Justice that previously exempted Federal law enforcement officers from Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale. She determined California law had not carved out an exemption for them.

California gun law attorney Chuck Michel has this to say about the issue:

California citizens are just as frustrated as federal law enforcement officers with the situation. When the roster of available pistols they can purchase dwindles down to a limited few – because manufacturers are refusing to implement “microstamping” – federal law enforcement’s objections will grow louder. And if pending legislation (SB 293) concerning “smart guns” passes and is signed by the Governor, federal law enforcement will also be forced to choose from an even more limited number of models … just like civilians.

Forgive us mere civilians if we aren’t completely sympathetic to the plight of the feds.

The Feds predicament stems from a recent (and correct) change in the Attorney General’s interpretation of existing California law. While California law restricts the sale of “unsafe handguns” by dealers, there are some exceptions to the restriction. The exception used by most law enforcement agencies and officers, and the one used until recently by federal law enforcement officers, was the following:

The sale or purchase of any pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person, if the pistol, revolver, or other firearm is sold to, or purchased by, the Department of Justice, any police department, any sheriff’s official, any marshal’s office, the Youth and Adult Correctional Agency, the California Highway Patrol, any district attorney’s office, or the military or naval forces of this state or of the United States for use in the discharge of their official duties. Nor shall anything in this section prohibit the sale to, or purchase by, sworn members of these agencies of any pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person.

Pen. Code, § 32000(b)(4)

You might notice, as did the California’s Attorney General, that federal law enforcement officers are not mentioned in this exception! The “Department of Justice” referred to in this section is the California Department of Justice, not a federal agency. So the AG’s analysis is correct: federal law enforcement is not exempt from the “unsafe handgun” restriction.

 He has much more on the issue here.