Joyce Foundation Money At Work

This post is written as part of the Media Matters Gun Facts fellowship. The purpose of the fellowship is to further Media Matters’ mission to comprehensively monitor, analyze, and correct conservative misinformation in the U.S. media Some of the worst misinformation occurs around the issue of guns, gun violence, and extremism, the fellowship program. The fellowship program is designed to fight this misinformation with facts.

Joan “JaPete” Peterson, a board member of the Brady Center, is now funded through the Joyce Foundation.

Not that what she wrote before really mattered but now that it is known that she is paid with Joyce Foundation money funneled through Media Matters it matters even less. Because now she is no longer a grieving sister driven by guilt and anger over her sister’s murder but merely a wholly paid-for shill for gun prohibition.

Quote Of The Day No. 2

Kurt Hofmann, the St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner, takes the mainstream media to task over their continued characterization of Operation Fast and Furious as “botched gun sting”. His article titled, “Let’s be clear–the only thing ‘botched’ in ‘Project Gunwalker’ was the cover-up”, examines why the operation was never about tracking guns. He concludes:

To allow the characterization of “Project Gunwalker” as a “botched sting operation” to go unchallenged is to give the perpetrators near (or at?) the very top of the Obama government a free pass on the utter evil of this monstrosity, and allow “gun control” apologists to blame it on desperation stemming from “weak U.S. gun laws,” because of the “gun lobby.”

Quote Of The Day No. 1

Mayor Bloomberg and his Illegal Mayors are up in arms over the prospect of H.R. 822 – the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011 – passing Congress. So much so that they have started a new website and commissioned another push poll whose results, to be frank, aren’t all that good for the gun prohibitionists.

However, Bob Owens – Confederate Yankee – asks the most pertinent question regarding Bloomberg and MAIG.

Isn’t it interesting that Bloomberg and the largely Democratic MAIG have all the time in the world to disparage lawful citizens, but can’t seem to come together to issue such much as a strongly worded statement again the Obama Administration, elements of which have walked more than 2,000 guns to drug cartels and allowed convicted felons to buy guns in the Midwest?

GRPC 2011 Draft Agenda Released

The Second Amendment Foundation has released their draft agenda for the 2011 Gun Rights Policy Conference.

There will be a lot of notable speakers at this year’s conference including Adam Winkler of UCLA, John Fund of the Wall Street Journal, and Sandy Froman, the former President of the NRA.

Gun bloggers and podcasters will be well represented. Kenn Blanchard of The Black Man with a Gun podcast, David Hardy of the Of Arms and the Law blog, David Codrea of the National Gun Rights Examiner, Dave Workman of the Seattle Gun Rights Examiner, and David Kopel of the Volokh Conspiracy will all be part of various panels in Chicago.

Topics of note will include Supreme Court History, Media Bias, Personal Defense and the Legal System, Operation Fast and Furious, and What ATF and Government Regulations Mean to Gunowners.

Of course, the longest panel discussion will be reserved for Second Amendment litigation. This panel will feature Alan Gura, Donald Kilmer of the Nordyke case, David Jensen, and David Sigale.

I am definitely looking forward to this conference. I will try to blog throughout the conference in an attempt to share some real time information.

Kachalsky v. Cacace Appealed To 2nd Circuit Court Of Appeals

In a move that was expected, Alan Gura filed a notice of appeal with the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in Kachalsky v. Cacace. This is the case challenging New York State’s requirement to show “proper cause” for a pistol carry permit. From the docketing notice:

Date: September 12, 2011
Docket #: 11-3642
Short Title: Kachalsky v. Cacace
DC Docket #: 10-cv-5413
DC Court: SDNY (WHITE PLAINS)
DC Judge: Seibel

DOCKETING NOTICE

A notice of appeal filed by Alan Kachalsky, Christina Nikolov, Johnnie Nance, Anna Marcucci-Nance, Eric Detmer in the above referenced case was docketed today as 11-3642. This number must appear on all documents related to this case that are filed in this Court.

The notice of appeal consisted of Judge Seibel’s decision in the case plus the docket history of the case from the District Court.

Witness List For House Judiciary Hearing On HR 822

The House Judiciary Committee has released their witness list for tomorrow’s hearing on HR 822 – the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011. It includes some very familiar names.

Witness List

Ms. Joyce Lee Malcolm
Professor of Law
George Mason University

Mr. David B. Kopel
Adjunct Professor
Denver University Sturm College of Law

Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey
Philadelphia Police Department

Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey previously served as head of D.C.’s Metro Police Department. Prior to that he served in the Chicago Police Department for almost 30 years rising to the level of Deputy Superintendent. That background combined with the way the Philly PD has been treating gun owners leads me to believe that Ramsey will be the token witness to testify against HR 822.

Both Joyce Lee Malcolm and Dave Kopel have strong pro-gun credentials.

As Sebastian of Snowflakes in Hell notes today, “Let the hysterics begin.” I think we can fully expect more counter-attacks on H.R. 822 by the likes of Mayor Bloomberg, the Brady Campaign, and VPC.

Help A Gunnie Hit By Fire In Texas

John at Gun Geek Rants is asking for help for a fellow gunnie in Texas.

Unless you have been under a rock or only watch Project Runway marathons on Lifetime, you know that Texas has been suffering under a tremendous series of wildfires. One of the worst is the Bastrop Complex Fire. This fire has destroyed at least 1,500 homes, most of Bastrop State Park, and resulted in 2 fatalities.

Virgil Tripp of Tripp Research and STI fame was one of those who lost his home. However, his business was not hit and is still in operation. John has this suggestion.

My suggestion is that you go buy a part from them. Keep them so busy they don’t have time to think about their house burning down. Besides, haven’t you been looking for an excuse to buy a bulletproof 1911 mag?

The link to Tripp Research is here.

Sounds like a win-win to me. You get top-notch parts and you help out a family hit by a catastrophe. You can see a picture of the wildfire below. To me it looks like what Armageddon must look like.

Brady Campaign Brings In A Head Hunter

The Brady Campaign/Center has brought in executive search firm Korn/Ferry International to help them find their next president. Korn/Ferry International is the world’s largest executive search firm and is a publicly-traded company. These guys don’t work for free. My guess is that to bring in a firm like Korn/Ferry will cost at least $100,000 and probably more.

Kaveman at Days of Our Trailers blog does an excellent job in fisking the Brady’s job announcment. Regarding a couple of the job responsibilities:

“S/he will be expected to create and execute a comprehensive strategy that utilizes a wide range of voices to deliver the organization’s messages.”

Get that? They want a wide range of voices to say what we want them to say. Nice.

“The CEO shall be responsible for effective stewardship of the organization’s existing resources and for identifying and attracting new resources to the Brady Campaign.”

Translation: Must be good enough at dancing in the blood to make people want to pay to watch it.

Sebastian at Snowflakes In Hell does an excellent job at analyzing the Brady Campaign/Center’s stated priority of building the grassroots and notes:

I hate to break to the Bradys but grassroots are generally a bottom up thing, not a top down thing. NRA exists from the bottom up. It did not create its grassroots, it’s grassroots created it (or took it over, more accurately). I don’t predict Brady will have much success in this, because they are going about it wrong. The big disadvantage they have over us is that anti-gun is not a hobby. Shooting is, and one that is practiced by millions of Americans. That gives a natural base of support on which you can build a grassroots-based movement.

This is precisely why the Brady Campaign and Center is having to spend a six-figure sum to find a new CEO and President. They don’t have a farm team at the grassroots with which to build potential future leaders. The local and regional gun control organizations that would normally constitute a farm team are just like the national organization – white, upper-middle class, top-down organizations funded by grant money and not by dues paying members. With regard to their grassroots problem, they remind me of Gertrude Stein’s comment on Oakland, California – “There is no there there.”

The posting by Korn/Ferry International is here and shown below. The other thing this posting does is give a sense of what to expect from the Brady Campaign in terms of activity. Note the programmatic goal of having all guns “child-proofed” by 2015.

COMPANY Posted: Aug 15, 2011
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence

LOCATION
United States

COMPANY BACKGROUND/CULTURE
The Brady Campaign, a non-partisan 501© (4) is the nation’s largest and best-known citizens’ organization working for stronger gun laws. It works at the state and federal levels to prevent gun violence by supporting and defending sensible gun laws, regulations and public policies, mobilizing grassroots activists, electing pro-gun-control public officials and increasing public awareness of the realities of gun violence.

The Brady Campaign is supported by the chapters of its Million Mom March, and thousands of other activists, community leaders, law enforcement officials and ordinary citizens to build coalitions and fight gun violence. The Brady Campaign also has an affiliated Political Action Committee allowing it to be active in federal elections.

The affiliated BradyCenter to Prevent Gun Violence is the legal action, research and education component of the organization. It operates as a 501© (3). Founded in 1983, the Center works to educate the general public about the issues surrounding gun violence in the United States. The Center’s Legal Action Project has been at the forefront of the movement to compel the gun industry to reform its sales and marketing practices. Overall, the Center provides innovative educational and public health solutions to gun violence in our communities.

The Brady Campaign has embraced building this grassroots strength as one of its most important priorities for the years ahead. It has targeted key states and communities in which to concentrate. While it will take time to build, this effort must proceed with urgency. The new President will be expected to take the lead in making this happen.

The organization is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with a staff of 25. There are 5 regional staff members in other parts of the country and the two entities have a combined annual budget of $5.3 million.

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES
The CEO will be a proven, results-oriented manager of people, teams, and organizations. S/He will provide the Brady Campaign with strategic leadership and bear ultimate responsibility for the organization’s programs, operations, and staff. The CEO will oversee effective program delivery and the executive team in its day-to-day management of the organization. S/he will be expected to create and execute a comprehensive strategy that utilizes a wide range of voices to deliver the organization’s messages.

The CEO will report to the Board of Directors on the activities of the organization. The CEO will ensure that the Brady Campaign is a financially sustainable organization by working in partnership with the Board of Directors, the executive team and appropriate staff. The CEO shall be responsible for effective stewardship of the organization’s existing resources and for identifying and attracting new resources to the Brady Campaign.

Additionally, specific objectives include:

Organizational Objectives

•Foster a culture throughout the organization where issues are discussed and resolved, decisions are made, people are assigned responsibility for the achievement of concrete, measurable outcomes and then held accountable for the results.
•Work closely with the senior staff to assess and refine the structures and operating procedures necessary to foster increased collaboration among departments as well as greater decision-making roles for the organization’s senior managers.
•Insure that a plan is executed and results are achieved to increase the diversity of the Board, the staff and the volunteer base of the organization.
•Insure that a wide range of effective voices including Board members, staff and volunteers are assigned to work nationally and in targeted communities throughout the country to make the case for reducing and preventing gun violence.
•With the assistance of the Board and the Development Department expand the involvement of staff and volunteers to raise substantial amounts of money from new and existing major donors, and foundations.
•In cooperation with Development Department staff complete a rigorous review of the direct marketing effort and all development efforts to include planned giving, foundation grants, events and major gifts to insure that the organization is maximizing opportunities for net revenue.
•Insure that the organization is making maximum use of the new technologies to support grassroots organizing, fund raising, sharing of best practices among community based activists and other parts of the movement and communicating the movement’s messages to a broad range of communities.
•Work closely with the Chair of the Board and the Chair of the Nominating Committee to insure that a pool of potential Board members is developed and tested to insure that excellent people are recruited to succeed members whose terms are expiring.

Programmatic Objectives

•Spearhead and actively support the efforts to build a powerful grassroots movement in those states and communities that have initially been targeted for concentration. Insure that metrics and milestones are established and adhered to.
•Lead a process to develop and implement a comprehensive communications strategy that will effectively make the case that gun violence is a pressing public issue, requiring urgent action.
•Develop an action plan to advocate aggressively for sensible gun laws
•Insure that messages resonate and have the desired effect with particular targeted communities and groups and that they are delivered by the most effective messengers over the most appropriate channels.
•Develop strategies to determine and promote evidence-based arguments for public policies, which are grounded in research and support common sense efforts at reducing gun violence.
•Take the lead in building a more unified and broad based movement, linking with other organizations and people with similar interests such as communities of color, groups combating domestic violence, public health, suicide prevention, law enforcement, faith-based organizations as well as other groups devoted to reducing gun violence.
•Build the movement to insure that all guns in our nation are childproofed by 2015.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE / QUALIFICATIONS

The ideal candidate will be an effective and inspiring leader and public representative with a strong commitment to eliminating gun violence. S/he will be expected to make common sense measures to prevent gun violence broadly accepted in our society. S/he will provide organizational and strategic leadership to the board and staff, guiding and integrating Brady’s public education and political programs while driving an ambitious agenda of grassroots expansion and activist mobilization. While no one person will possess all of the qualities enumerated below, the ideal candidate will possess many of the following professional and personal characteristics:

•Experience managing a staff, providing it with clear direction, delegating where appropriate, holding people accountable while assuming the ultimate responsibility for the effective performance of the organization. A person receptive to and not threatened by input and feedback from senior staff and lay leadership.
•A successful track record and a genuine enthusiasm for raising substantial amounts of money from individuals, corporations and foundations.
•A demonstrated commitment to diversity with a record of recruiting and managing a talented and diverse staff. A person who places a high priority on the professional development of staff through delegation of responsibility and collaborative effort.
•Exceptional verbal and written communications skills including experience with both print and electronic media and the new technologies, as well as the ability to serve as the organization’s chief spokesperson, often in the face of public resistance to the organization’s positions.
•An understanding of the application of modern technology for membership development, fundraising, public education, lobbying and organizational management.
•A background in the design and management of legislative agendas, grassroots organizing and public education programs.
•Experience, working effectively in a bipartisan fashion with a variety of constituencies–other organizations, community leaders, elected officials, current and future funders and the media.
•Experience working with or serving as a member of a lively and highly engaged non-profit Board of Directors.
•A deep seated commitment to the prevention of gun violence.
•A leader who can articulate a vision, communicate organizational priorities as well as inspire and motivate people to work hard in the pursuit of a mission.
•A strategic and creative thinker with the organizational skills necessary to insure that strategies are implemented and objectives are achieved.
•A person with excellent political skills, who is comfortable with controversy and diversity and who will be able to balance, negotiate, network and build coalitions among diverging and competing points of views, both within the organization and outside it.
•A good listener who inspires trust and confidence and remains open to the ideas of others.
•The capacity and desire to develop a rapport with a wide variety of persons, volunteers, victims, all levels of staff and lay leadership.
•A high level of energy, an ability to work long hours and a willingness to travel throughout the country.
•Unimpeachable integrity.
•A sense of humor.
EDUCATION
An undergraduate degree is required. A graduate degree is highly preferred.

COMPENSATION
The competitive compensation package will be offered to attract outstanding candidates.

Video Of Walgreen’s Pharmacist Defending Himself

Jeremy Hoven was a pharmacist for Walgreens in Benton Township, Michigan. I say was because Walgreens fired him by e-mail a week after he defended himself and the store’s staff from a pair of armed robbers back in May.

Mr. Hoven has filed a wrongful termination suit against Walgreens. Mr. Hoven’s attorney, Peter Kosick, released to the media the surveillance tape of the event and ABC News has made it available.

As the tape clearly shows, Mr. Hoven was in the process of calling 9-1-1 when one of the robbers jumped over the counter and pointed a gun at him. It was only then that he drew his weapon and fired upon the robber.

Peter Kosick of St. Joseph, Hoven’s attorney, tells ABC News that, in his opinion, Walgreens should have commended his client for bravery. That, too, is the opinion of township police Lt. Delman Lange, who, after reviewing the surveillance video, told the local paper, “If it was me, I would have done the same thing.”

However, Walgreens disputes that Mr. Hoven should have protected himself along with the other employees in the store.

Though Hoven was licensed by the state of Michigan to carry a gun, Walgreen discourages its pharmacists from packing pistols. A spokeswoman for the drug chain told ABC News in an email that while Walgreens would not be able to disclose its policies, they were written to protect the safety of customers and employees. “Store employees receive comprehensive training on our robbery procedures and how to react and respond,” she wrote. Walgreens’ approach is “endorsed by law enforcement, which strongly advises against confrontation of crime suspects. Compromise is safer.”

While Walgreens says compromise is safer, the question is for whom? The employee or the company and their insurance company? I plan to stick with my decision made back in May to not give my patronage to Walgreens.

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

H/T Stephen Wenger

UPDATE:  ABC’s Good Morning America gave the story quite a bit of air time this morning. They even brought in one of their legal reporters to discuss the lawsuit. He made the point that even if they can prove that Mr. Hoven knew of the “non-escalation” policy, it seems like “a stupid time to enforce it.”

Quote Of The Day

Mark Steyn is a Canadian who gets it as does Canadian blogger Kathy Shaidle.

What’s missing from these commemorations?

Firemen?

Oh, please. There are some pieces of the puzzle we have to leave out. As Mayor Bloomberg’s office has patiently explained, there’s “not enough room” at the official Ground Zero commemoration to accommodate any firemen. “Which is kind of weird,” wrote the Canadian blogger Kathy Shaidle, “since 343 of them managed to fit into the exact same space ten years ago.”

I find this especially poignant since my second cousin Kevin McEntyre is a New York City fireman, who by the grace of God, had gone off duty that morning and was on his way home when the terrorists hit the World Trade Center. Many in his fire company were not so lucky and were among the 343 that died that day. Kevin spent many days afterwards at Ground Zero searching for survivors and then for the bodies of the dead.