Uncategorized

Gun Ownership In Other Countries

September 2, 2011 by

Cam Edwards interviewed David Tipple, the owner of Gun City in New Zealand. The gun prohibitionists in that country are upset that the store is having a promotion for Father’s Day in which one gun will be sold for one New Zealand dollar.

The most interesting thing about the interview is when Mr. Tipple described how only licensed gun owners are allowed to purchase firearms in New Zealand. He compared their license to an American driver’s license except that to obtain one you must a police background check which includes interviews with your family and your neighbors, an inspection of your home, and an inspection of your gun safe. When you hear what people have to do in other countries in order to possess a firearm, you give thanks for the farsightedness of our forefathers when they adopted the Second Amendment.

Uncategorized

More On NRA/CRPA Amicus Briefs

September 2, 2011 by

The NRA and the CRPA filed amicus briefs in the California carry case Richards v. Prieto. The release from Chuck Michel is below which explains them in more detail.

August 31, 2011 – Today, the California Rifle and Pistol Foundation (“CRPA Foundation”) and the National Rifle Association filed amicus briefs in support of appellants in Richards v. Prieto, who have challenged California’s regulatory scheme governing the issuance of permits to carry concealed firearms (“CCW permits”) and Yolo County policies for its (non)-issuance of permits to residents seeking to exercise their right to carry a loaded firearm in public.

At issue in Richards is a Yolo County policy conditioning the issuance of CCW permits on a wholly discretionary assessment of each applicant’s “moral character” and stated “good cause.” In practice, Yolo’s policy prohibits the vast majority of county residents from obtaining a permit.

In its brief, available here, CRPA Foundation argues in support of the appellants that Yolo County’s CCW permitting policies are unconstitutional to the extent they deny law-abiding residents the only lawful means of exercising their right to bear operable handguns for self-defense anywhere in the State, despite the United States Supreme Court’s declaration that armed self-defense is a “central component” of our Second Amendment rights.

CRPA Foundation’s brief further provides an historical analysis of the right to keep and bear arms, which establishes that Yolo County’s broad prohibition on the carriage of loaded firearms is categorically unconstitutional and, at a minimum, fails to satisfy the heightened scrutiny required of regulations that so severely burden the right as to eliminate it altogether.

CRPAF is itself currently before the Ninth Circuit, litigating its own challenge to prohibitory local CCW permitting policies. Briefing in that case, Peruta v. San Diego, will be completed onASeptember 6, 2011.

In its brief, available here, NRA provides the Ninth Circuit panel with significant background on the practices and experiences of other states in issuing carry permits throughout the nation. NRA’s amicus brief beautifully illustrates the fact that issuing such permits to law-abiding citizens will not increase crime rates and may, in fact, cause them to fall.

The CRPA amicus brief is available here.

The NRA amicus brief is available here.

Uncategorized

Classy Move

September 2, 2011 by 1 Comment

The NRA and the California Rifle and Pistol Association just filed an amicus brief in a California carry case, Richards v. Prieto. In return, the Second Amendment Foundation just issued this press release yesterday expressing their thanks for the NRA/CRPA support. Its good to see them playing well together!

SAF THANKS NRA, CRPAF FOR AMICUS BRIEFS IN RICHARDS V. PRIETO CASE

For Immediate Release: 9/1/2011

BELLEVUE, WA – The Second Amendment Foundation today thanked the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Foundation for filing amicus briefs in SAF’s challenge of Yolo County, California’s policies that exploit the state’s regulations on the issuance of concealed firearms carry permits.

Joining SAF in that lawsuit is the CalGuns Foundation. The case is known as Richards v. Prieto. It targets Yolo County’s arbitrary policy that requires CCW applicants to provide good cause for obtaining a permit, and subjects each applicant to a “moral character” standard.

“The policies practices in Yolo County are clearly unconstitutional and should be overturned,” said SAF Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “We filed the lawsuit because citizens should not be subjected to such policies simply in an effort to exercise their rights to bear arms for personal protection.

“We are delighted that our good friends at both the NRA and CRPA have filed briefs in support of this cause,” he continued. “Authorities in Yolo County who are trying to perpetuate this egregious policy despite the Supreme Court’s clear determination that self-defense is a cornerstone tenet of the right to keep and bear arms.”

Gottlieb noted that the overwhelming majority of the states have adopted shall-issue statutes for concealed carry licenses or permits, and that they have worked remarkably well by removing the authority from local officials who may want to abuse complicated regulations such as those that exist in the Golden State.

“State and local governments should be scrambling to review, and where necessary, adjust firearms laws and regulations in the wake of two Supreme Court rulings on the Second Amendment,” Gottlieb said. “When local governments continue to resist, rather than comply with, the principles and spirit of high court rulings and the Constitution, we’ll continue to meet them in court. As NRA and CRPAF have demonstrated with their briefs in this case, when we take people to court, we’re going to have company.”

Uncategorized

Western NC DA Confuses A Supermarket With A Restaurant

September 2, 2011 by 1 Comment

The major supermarket chain in Western North Carolina is Ingles Markets. It sells beer and wine but doesn’t allow on-premises consumption. That didn’t stop District Attorney Jerry Wilson from prosecuting a Burnsville man for violating NCGS 14-269.3 which bars firearms in places where alcohol is sold and consumed.

Paul Valone of Grass Roots North Carolina takes up the story from here:

At precisely the moment House Bill 111 for concealed carry in restaurants is languishing in the Senate Judiciary II Committee, a western North Carolina man is being prosecuted for carrying a firearm in violation of GS 14-269.3 – a place where “alcohol is sold and consumed” – EVEN THOUGH HE IS CLEARLY INNOCENT.

To be clear: GRNC is not defending the actions of the man in question. He also faces the common law charge of “going armed to the terror of the public” and might well be guilty as charged. But the arrogance of local law enforcement and the district attorney clearly signal that you too might come under the prosecutorial knife, and that we need restaurant carry RIGHT NOW!

Arrested in Burnsville, Larry Dean Hunter is charged with “Going armed to the terror of the public” and violating GS 14-269.3, which bars firearms “where alcoholic beverages are sold and consumed.” The problem? He was arrested for displaying a firearm in an INGLES SUPERMARKET, where alcohol might be sold, but is definitely not “consumed.”

An innocent mistake on the part of law enforcement? Think again. GRNC president Paul Valone actually called the office of District Attorney Jerry Wilson, representing Avery, Madison, Mitchell, Watauga, and Yancey Counties. Here is how the conversation went:

Valone: “I am calling regarding the potential misinterpretation of a pending case regarding our concealed handgun statute in Yancey County. Can you direct me who to talk to?”

D.A. office: “Are you a defendant or a relative in the case?”

Valone: “I don’t want to talk about the case. I want to talk to the District Attorney about GS 14-269.3.”

D.A. office: “I’m terminating this call now.” CLICK.

Given that GRNC had already made attempts to contact the Burnsville Chief of Police, Brian Buchanan, and did contact the town’s mayor, Danny McIntosh, it is safe to say that D.A. Jerry Wilson is aware of the case and dodging questions on a prosecution they clearly intend to continue, despite the fact that GS 14-269.3 clearly does not apply.

 In the alert Grass Roots North Carolina released this evening on this, they are asking that North Carolinians use this to push the State Senate over HB 111 as well as ask the DA and Burnsville PD what the heck is going on.

  • CALL ELECTED DISTRICT ATTORNEY JERRY WILSON and let him know you are on to his scam: Wilson’s office number is 828-268-6610.
  • CONTACT BURNSVILLE MAYOR DANNY MCINTOSH and deliver the message that he needs to keep a tighter leash on his clearly anti-gun Chief of Police, Brian Buchanan. McIntosh can be reached at either mayor@townofburnsville.org or 828-682-2420.
  • CONTACT SEN. PHIL BERGER: This is most important. As President Pro Tem of the NC Senate, it is Berger who controls the fate of HB 111 for concealed carry in restaurants which serve alcohol. E-mail AND call Berger at Phil.Berger@ncleg.net and (919) 733-5708. Deliver the message below.


DELIVER THIS MESSAGE

Dear Senator Berger:

Your inaction in passing concealed carry in restaurants is now resulting in criminal prosecution by a malicious district attorney who is reading the ban on firearms in places where alcohol is sold and consumed to include even grocery stores. The D.A. is Jerry Wilson of Watauga County and the citizen is Jerry Dean Hunter, who is being prosecuted for having a gun in an Ingles Supermarket.

Passing the restaurant carry language in House Bill 111, which is still alive but languishing in the Senate Judiciary II Committee, could solve the problem. Moreover, it could deter crime. According to the Richmond “Times-Dispatch,” after Virginia passed restaurant carry, major crimes in restaurants dropped by 5.2%.

Gun owners didn’t give control of the legislature to Republicans only to have them slavishly adhere to polling of a public which is unaware that permit-holders would still be prohibited from imbibing alcohol. And reports that you refused to include restaurant carry in House Bill 650 in order to protect Republican legislators in marginal districts are now moot: Republicans redrew the districts.

If Republicans want continued support from Second Amendment advocates, they should deliver on legislation they were elected to pass. I will be monitoring your actions via Grass Roots North Carolina legislative alerts.

Respectfully,

Uncategorized

The Mounties Go Beyond Dog Sleds And Horse Patrols

September 2, 2011 by 2 Comments

Sgt. Preston of the Yukon wouldn’t know what to do with this! The Royal Canadian Mounted Police are going high-tech to investigate crime and accident scenes. They are testing unmanned drone helicopters called the Draganflyer X6.

The Draganflyer is made by Draganfly Innovations of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. It can mount any number of different cameras or camcorders. The X6 weighs only 35 ounces and can carry a payload of 18 ounces.

The RCMP say that they only plan to use the drone for crime and accident scene investigations and not for surveillance. However, the manufacturer does promote it for military apps for intelligence gathering.

H/T Predator BDU blog

Uncategorized

Gov. Susana Martinez On Concealed Carry

September 2, 2011 by

Gov. Susana Martinez (R-NM) recently requalified for her New Mexico concealed carry license. I covered that including video of her qualification test here.

In an interview with Cam Edwards of NRA News, she discusses her background with firearms. Her parents owned a security guard business in El Paso, TX and she began carrying (openly) as a security guard at the age of 18.  Eventually, she ended up in New Mexico and became a prosecutor. She says getting her concealed carry license was just the next step in her evolution as a gun owner.

Uncategorized

I Can’t Believe An ATF Official Actually Said This

September 1, 2011 by 4 Comments

Julie Torres is the Deputy Assistant Director for Field Operations (East) with ATF. On Monday she sent out an open letter to all Federal firearms licensees regarding the September 11th anniversary.

The letter warns FFLs to exercise “increased awareness and vigilance” as September 11th approaches. While ATF has no specific threat information, they obviously believe that gun shops would be targets for terrorists seeking weapons.

After giving links to publications on safety and security and after reminding dealers that they have a legal obligation to report losses to both local law enforcement as well as ATF, Ms. Torres includes this statement:

Any time you spot suspicious activity associated with your Federal firearms license, please contact your local ATF field office immediately.

In light of the behavior of ATF officials in Project Gunwalker I find this highly ironic. Dealers did contact ATF immediately in both Texas and Arizona when they were faced with dubious buyers making suspicious purchases. They were ordered by the ATF to let those sales go through even though they were going to what obviously were straw purchasers.

So, Ms. Torres, you may want to reevaluate your choice of words in the future. Or better yet, cooperate with the dealers when they are asking you for permission to reject suspicious sales.

Uncategorized

Quote Of The Day

September 1, 2011 by

ATF Special Agent Vince Cefalu was interviewed on the DemocracyNow radio show yesterday. Mr. Cefalu has been a ardent critic of ATF management for years and has been retaliated against more than once for being a whistleblower. He is one of the founders of the website CleanUpATF.org. In his interview yesterday, he made the following comment about the guns that walked in Operation Fast and Furious.

So we allowed these guns to go, continue on, in the hopes of establishing some sort of chain, or this iron pipeline, which was so far from the truth, but we were never going to be able to follow it to fruition. … So, the only way to track those guns were to find them at the crime scenes or (on) dead bodies.

I think that about says it all.

Uncategorized

Preparing For The Zombie Apocalypse?

September 1, 2011 by 5 Comments

Needing a break from Project Gunwalker, the economy, and the trials and tribulations of ATF, I stumbled across this – the South African made NeoPup PAW A4 20mm infantry weapon system. If there was ever a weapon designed for the Zombie Apocalypse, it was this. One hit from its 1698 grain projectile and it will be all over for the living dead!

The NeoPup PAW 20 A4 is sort of a rifle crossed with a stand-along grenade laucher put on an off-set bullpup body. The Kitup Blog notes that the PAW 20 is:

Intended for infantry targets in open and behind cover as well as unarmored or lightly armored vehicles…Maximum range for the PAW is 1,000 meters for area targets or a group of Soldiers. Against point targets such as small vehicles or machine gun positions the maximum effective range is 500 meters.

Specifications:

Caliber – 20×42
Muzzle velocity – 1,017 ft/s
Weight – 6kg
Length (open) – 33.25 inches
Length (stowed) – 30.3 inches
Barrel – 14.76 inches
Range – 1000m
Magazine capacity – 6
Semi-auto, rotating bolt, gas operated