It Depends On Whose Ox Is Being Gored

The Wall Street Journal reported that the Freedom Group’s expansion of their Remingon Arms facility in Ilion, NY plant will add 40-50 new jobs there. They are moving their Bushmaster operations from Windham, ME to Ilion in a consolidation of operations. The means that Bushmaster AR-15’s – those evil black rifles – will now be made in New York State.

The senior Senator from New York, Chuck Schumer, has a well-deserved reputation for being an enemy of gun owners and gun rights. That is why I find his remarks on the expansion of the Remington plant so ironic. He says he is all for guns if it means jobs for his constituents and if he can push the military to buy more “made-in-New York” firearms.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 22, 2011

SCHUMER: 40-50 NEW JOBS COMING TO REMINGTON’S MANUFACTURING PLANT IN ILION – JOBS WILL BE A HUGE BOOST TO MOHAWK VALLEY’S ECONOMY

Bushmaster Firearms Set To Move Production From Maine Facility To Ilion, Bringing Scores of New Jobs And Economic Opportunity To Central NY

Schumer Is A Long-Time Supporter Of Remington Plant, Helped Bring New Business By Securing Vital Grants And a Level Playing Field to Compete For Government Contracts

Schumer: These Jobs Are Great News For Mohawk Valley Economy

Today, U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer joined Remington officials and plant employees to announce that Bushmaster Firearms is relocating a manufacturing facility from Windham, Maine to Ilion, NY, bringing over forty new jobs to Central New York in the process. Schumer has been a long-time supporter of manufacturing at the Remington plant, urging top Army officials to open up competition for the Army’s small arms contracts to other U.S. manufacturers and domestic producers across the country like the Ilion, New York-based Remington. Today, Schumer applauded Remington’s decision to add new jobs to the productive and capable work force already making the factory an economic powerhouse in the Mohawk Valley.

“What a great day for Remington’s Ilion plant, the Mohawk Valley, and Central New York’s economy,” said Senator Schumer. “Thanks to Remington’s continued confidence in this capable workforce, we’re going to see even more good-paying jobs at the plant, creating positive ripple effects throughout the region. The addition of these jobs strengthens the ability of the Remington plant in Ilion to compete for the many Department of Defense small arms contracts available this year by adding to the skilled workforce and further enhancing the manufacturing capability for M-4 and M-16 style firearms. As I have always done, I will work tirelessly for a fair and open contracting process with the military so the Ilion plant and its workers can compete on a level playing field, and continue to produce the high quality equipment our men and women in uniform deserve and expect.”

Senator Schumer has long been a strong supporter of the Remington facility. He led the effort in Congress to repeal the law that limited competition for small arms contracts, so that Remington can now compete for small arms contracts with the Department of Defense. Schumer also successfully pushed the Army to open up their application process and solicit competing contracts in order to modify Army’s M-4 carbine. As a result of this effort, Remington is now competing with other companies to win the contract.

After the Army identified a requirement to upgrade its M-24 sniper rifle used in Afghanistan, Sen. Schumer secured funding for the upgrade from Congress. Schumer’s success in securing funding for this project ultimately allowed Remington to compete for and win a contract to upgrade the Army’s 3600 M24 sniper rifles (now called the XM2010). The Army recently ordered an initial quantity of 250 XM2010s, which Remington is currently manufacturing and the Army is shipping to our sniper teams in Afghanistan. Schumer’s push for an open contracting process that allows Remington to compete with other manufacturers has resulted in economic growth and new jobs coming to the Ilion facility.

Given that the Freedom Group’s headquarters is in Madison, North Carolina – just north of Greensboro – it is a shame that they didn’t bring those jobs South to North Carolina.

Obama Says He Didn’t Approve “Fast and Furious” (updated)

According to tweets from CBS Investigative Reporter Sharyl Attkisson, President Obama was asked this evening about Operation Fast and Furious and and ATF’s “gunwalking”. He stated he didn’t approve the operation.

@SharylAttkisson
President Obama tonight was asked about ATF Gunwalking Scandal, subject of @CBSEveningNews investigation.

@SharylAttkisson
President Obama stated that he did not approve the ATF operation. Watch @CBSEveningNews @katiecouric for the latest Gunwalking developmts

I am looking for when and where Obama stated this and will post the full text when it is available.

UPDATE: Obama’s comments came in a sit-down interview with Jorge Ramos of Univision. The interview is posted below.

Sharyl Attkisson reports on the interview here.

H/T Sharyl Attkisson for video

H.R.1181 — Protecting Gun Owners in Bankruptcy Act of 2011

Rep. Tim Griffin (R-Arkansas) along with Rep. Mark Critz (D-PA) have introduced a bill on March 17th that would protect up to $3,000 worth of a person’s firearms from being taken in a bankruptcy proceeding.

Griffin is a freshman Republican representing the Little Rock, Arkansas are in Congress. He had served as a JAG Officer in Iraq with the 101st Airborne Division and then as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Griffin is A-rated by the NRA and was endorsed by them in 2010.

Critz, a Democrat, is from Johnstown and won the seat formerly held by the late Rep. Jack Murtha in a special election in May 2010. He went on to hold on to the seat in the 2010 general election. He had worked as the District Director for Murtha for many years. Critz is A-rated by the NRA and was endorsed by them in the 2010 general election. He is also a co-sponsor of HR 822 – National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity.

112th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 1181

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to include firearms in the types of property allowable under the alternative provision for exempting property from the estate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 17, 2011

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas (for himself and Mr. CRITZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to include firearms in the types of property allowable under the alternative provision for exempting property from the estate.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Protecting Gun Owners in Bankruptcy Act of 2011′.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS.

Section 522 of title 11, the United States Code, is amended–

(1) in subsection (d) by adding at the end the following:

`(13) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed $3,000 in value, in a single rifle, shotgun, or pistol, or any combination thereof.’, and

(2) in subsection (f)(4)(A)–

(A) in clause (xiv) by striking `and’ at the end,

(B) in clause (xv) by striking the period at the end and inserting `; and’, and

(C) by adding at the end the following:

`(xvi) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed $3,000 in value, in a single rifle, shotgun, or pistol, or any combination thereof.’.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

(a) Effective Date- Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(b) Application of Amendments- The amendments made by this Act shall apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Gaddafi’s Gold

Gold is often used as an alternative investment, as a hedge against inflation, or, as in the past, as a means to back up paper currencies with something of real value. Thanks to Colonel Gaddafi, the despot ruling the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya – otherwise known as just Libya, there is now another use.

Mercenaries.

According to the Financial Times, Gaddafi has 143.8 metric tons of gold at his disposal with which to pay for his army of mercenaries. In dollar terms with gold at $1,444 a troy ounce, this converts to $6,676,012,459. While that might not support the American military for a long time, it certainly can pay for a lot of mercenaries willing to fight to preserve Gaddafi’s position.

Challenge To USPS Ban On Firearms Dismissed

There will be a  hearing today in Bonidy et al v. USPS et al on the government’s motion to dismiss this case. It is set for 2pm before Judge Richard Matsch in U. S. District Court for the District of Colorado.

My post on the complaint can be found here and another post on the USPS’s Motion to Dismiss can be found here.

The plaintiff’s response to the motion to dismiss is here and the defense’s reply to the response is here.

The case was brought on behalf of Avon, CO residents Debbie and Tab Bonidy along with the National Association for Gun Rights as an institutional plaintiff by the Mountain States Legal Foundation in early October 2010. The Bonidys, who both hold Colorado concealed carry permits, are challenging the Postal Service’s restriction on firearms on Postal Service property and especially in the parking lot. The Postal Service does not provide them with home delivery and they must go to the Avon Post Office to pick up their mail.

UPDATE: Judge Richard Matsch took all of 24 minutes to decide to grant the Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss the case. Plaintiffs have 20 days to file an amended complaint.

COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Motion to Dismiss
1:56 p.m. Court in session.

Plaintiffs Tab and Debbie Bonidy and defendant United Postal Service’s client representative Rod Eves are present.

Court’s preliminary remarks and disclosure pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C § 455.

Mr. Manley answers questions asked by the Court regarding case facts and claims with respect to the postal service firearms’ regulation.

Argument by Ms. Farby [6].

Argument by Mr. Manley.

ORDERED: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, filed
December 6, 2010 [6], is granted with leave for plaintiffs to file an amended
complaint (20 days) by April 11, 2011.

2:20 p.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded.
Total time: 24 min.

Water Artillery

A company called Zoxna Airsoft has developed a mortar that fires water balloons using compressed air. Can you imagine how much fun we would have had – and how much trouble we could have gotten into – if we had these as kids?

I wonder when ATF will try to regulate them as a “destructive device”.

An Open Letter From Colleen Lawson To Illinois Legislators

Colleen and David Lawson were two of the plaintiffs in McDonald et al v. Chicago et al. Mrs. Lawson posted the open letter to Illinois legislators today on her Facebook page. She has graciously given me permission to reprint it here.

Dear Legislator:

Could you please help me decide which of my kids lives to save? Here’s the problem:

Last night yet another of my kids found himself on the goodbye end of a robber’s gun as the robber slowly counted down

“5 . . . 4 . . . 3 . . . 2 . . . “

I know you politicians told us “if it saves one life, then keeping guns away from law-abiding citizens is the right thing to do!” but I’m having a little trouble figuring out which life is the one to be saved. I’ve had most of these kids for 20 years or more, and I’m rather fond of them all.

My kid last night? It was his third time facing armed robbers in Chicago, in Illinois. Can you tell me how many times is just right and how many times is too many?

The one last night was in a convenience store at the time. He and his friend had gone into the store to buy soda, and they hid as the robber stuck his gun in the face of the store clerk and began counting down.

Do you give classes in hiding? Wait, that can’t be right, cause many kids get found anyway, and it’s not always easy to stay quiet if your heart is thudding and you’re afraid. Maybe you give classes in what kids should do if they find themselves around guns. No, that’s not right. State Sen. Annazette Collins proposed that idea, to keep kids safe and deglamorize firearms, and she was roundly trounced for the idea.

Mr. Legislator, all my kids have been robbed at gunpoint on the streets of Chicago — well, all the young ones, who still live in Chicago. Does that mean that it’s better for my kids to live someplace else? Wait, that can’t be right, because you keep telling us that Chicago is a good place to raise children.

Is it best to just stay home? That can’t be right, cause the first time he was robbed at gunpoint he was on the steps of his own house.

Maybe being in a group is best. No, that can’t be right, either. The last time, three of my kids had grouped together for safety as they walked home from a friend’s house. But their attackers had grouped together, too. Three unarmed victims, three robbers with guns, just over three blocks from home in what was once one of the three safest areas of the city.

Mr. Legislator, I have tried to keep my family safe by living in an area where lots of policemen live. But it seems to be open season on cops, too, in Chicago. Even Thomas Wortham, a cop who was also the son of a cop, was shot in front of his parents home as his father watched.

Should I try one of the other “safe” areas? No, less than twenty-four hours ago, an acquaintance of mine was in a group of 4 and got robbed in Lincoln Park by . . . a group of 4.

Maybe only going out in daylight is the answer? Or maybe in an area that’s more retail than residential? Gosh, that can’t be right: Two of my girls were attacked mid-afternoon as they waited for a bus right outside a major shopping mall.

Perhaps you say that everything’s fine because none of my kids were shot or killed, and because last night’s robber chose to be contented with the money and goods, and let the clerk and customers go. But it would have been hard to say that as I wiped the blood from the face of the one who’d had her head slammed into the concrete sidewalk as she and her friends were robbed.

And that can’t be right, anyhow, cause not everybody’s kids escape uninjured.

Can you tell me if there is a questionnaire that we give to a criminal to determine which ones will be “nice” and not kill their victims? Just hurt them a “little” or leave them in fear for a while? How much is “a little”? How long is an okay “while”?

Maybe I’ve misunderstood the whole “if it saves one life” policy; Does it mean that, so long as it’s MY kids life that’s saved by being unarmed on the streets of Chicago, the disarmed citizen policy in Illinois is still justified? Which kid? What do I tell the siblings? What do I tell my neighbors, as they mourn for their slain kids?

What if it’s your kid that gets killed or hurt, Mr. Legislator, and I’m unable to help?

A couple of these kids aren’t mine by birth: they just hang out at my house cause they feel safe here. Should I tell them to stop feeling safe?

To me, they’re all my kids, and I tell them every day how valuable they all are. One studies daily for her GED, one’s in college to be a grade school teacher, one’s still in high school, one works twelve hours a day helping underprivileged children, one’s less than a semester away from getting his law degree. Should I ease up on the value talk? Should I tell them that, “Hey, folks die every day, that’s just the way it is?” Devalue life a little bit so they don’t think there’s anything unusual about being helpless victims?

No. That can’t be right. Because that is exactly how you grow a criminal. You desensitize him to the value of life, take away his sense of what is right and what is wrong, and expose him to crime after crime after crime after crime until he sees no hope for the future and learns to either be a victim or to look for victims.

And that is exactly how you grow a victim. Let them know that there is no chance of anyone nearby who has the ability to help them if they find themselves at the mercy of an attacker. Gee, it sounds like the same thing you tell a would-be attacker, doesn’t it? Let them know that they need have no fear of anyone being able to fight back. And they will come. And they do come. And keep on coming. There are entire blocks in Chicago where street attacks have occurred weekly — WEEKLY, Legislator! — for years without a single arrest being made.

Dear Legislator, please tell me what I am to say to my kids today, when they ask me why this keeps happening to them. I really want to know. I don’t mean to cut into your busy day. I just want to do what’s right.

Don’t you?

Maybe it would be easiest to just share with me what you tell your own kids and I will share it with mine.

I totally understand that your intentions were good when Illinois first believed that criminals would obey the same no-gun laws that the law-abiding follow … but what do you tell your kids when they ask you why we have not ripped away that errant foundation as has every other state within America? What do you tell them when they ask how you will know which of them will be hurt or killed by an attacker, and how you have chosen that to be okay by you?

What do you tell your kids when they ask why we elected you, then gave some of you the right to conceal carry, and others of you the expense of a protection detail, and then nod our heads in submission as you tell the rest of us that it is better that we do not get the same ability to defend ourselves?

Criminals know that there are less than a thousand Chicago cops armed and able to stop them during any given shift these days.

I personally know thousands of Illinois private citizens who take their citizen responsibility seriously enough that 34 other states trust them to calmly, competently and maturely carry concealed firearms as they live their daily lives. The children in those states can stand on their own steps, shop in convenience stores and wait for busses near malls with the confidence that they and would-be criminals are constantly aware that someone may be right nearby to thwart an attack and help them stay safe. Someone who has so committed themselves to time, training and mastery of defense that they stand out easily as the calmest ones seen in an emergency situation.

But in Illinois, criminals and victims walk our streets with only the confidence that, unless you — personally, Legislator — stand in support of HB 148 and bring concealed carry to the lone holdout state of Illinois, no one will ever come to your children’s aid if they, like my kids, find themselves at the mercy of an attack. This can’t be right, can it?

Though I have taken the time to learn and master the calm and skill necessary to defend my family and yours, I cannot personally afford a security detail for my family at this time. If you won’t allow me to defend my children – and yours – in the face of armed attack on the streets of Illinois, will you kindly share your protection detail with my family? My neighbor wants to hear your answer, too.

And, if you will not, then tell me, please: What shall I say to my kid today, as I help him through the sound he’s heard again and again for the past 12 hours?

You remember — the one that goes “5 . . . 4 . . . 3 . . . 2 . . . ?”

How long should he wait for the final “click”?

How long should I?

Second ATF Agent Speaks Out On CBS News

ATF Special Agent Rene Jaquez was interviewed by Sharyl Attkisson on CBS News this evening. Agent Jaquez is stationed in Juarez, Mexico which has become one of the most dangerous locations in Mexico. He had previously been interviewed about Operation Fast and Furious (aka Project Gunwalker) on the Spanish-language station Univision.

More importantly, it now becomes evident that Operation Fast and Furious did not involve only the ATF.

But ATF wasn’t working alone on the case known as “Fast and Furious.” Documents show ATF had conference calls with “DHS” (Homeland Security). “USMS” (U.S. Marshals) and DEA. An “ICE,” or Customs agent, was on ATF’s Fast and Furious team. They were advised by an “AUSA,” or Assistant U.S. Attorney under the Justice Department.

North Carolina CCW Reform Delayed

The NRA-ILA sent out this alert on North Carolina HB 111 this afternoon. The bill would allow concealed carry in restaurants and eating establishments that serve alcohol. It would not change the law that makes it illegal for someone who is carrying concealed to consume alcohol. The bill would also allow concealed carry in state and local parks.

North Carolina: Right-to-Carry Reform Bill Delayed by the state House of Representatives

Monday, March 21, 2011

Please contact your state Representative TODAY!

Consideration for House Bill 111 has been delayed by the state House of Representatives. Please continue to contact your state Representative IMMEDIATELY and urge him or her to support H 111, and to support efforts to remove the Ross Amendment. To locate your state Representative and their contact information, please click here.

HB 111, introduced by state Representatives Mark Hilton (R-96), Jeff Barnhart (R-82), Fred Steen (R-76), and Kelly Hastings (R-110), would remove the prohibition on Right-to-Carry permit holders carrying a concealed firearm into any restaurant that serves alcohol on premises. It would also remove the ability of a local government to ban the carrying of concealed firearms by Right-to-Carry permit holders in local parks, and clarify that permit holders are allowed to carry in State Parks.

The bill was amended in subcommittee to allow servers in restaurants to ask patrons who order an alcoholic beverage whether they are carrying a concealed firearm. This amendment was proposed by state Representative Debra Ross (D-38), one of the most virulently anti-gun legislators in the General Assembly. During the debate, opponents of the legislation grossly misrepresented the current Right-to-Carry law repeatedly. While those opposed to the Ross Amendment questioned the wisdom waiters and waitresses asking such intrusive questions, supporters of the amendment claimed it is illegal for someone carrying a concealed firearm to order an alcoholic beverage, leading some to ask why servers should be asked to act as part-time law enforcement. However, it is not illegal to order alcohol while carrying a firearm. It is illegal to CONSUME alcohol while carrying. Should this law pass, along with the Ross Amendment, law-abiding permittees who simply order alcohol for a friend, but who have no intention of drinking alcohol themselves, may be asked by a server to reveal they are carrying a concealed firearm, thus negating the concept of carrying concealed. Anyone within earshot will certainly know the individual is carrying a firearm, including anyone who may be intent on committing a violent crime at that restaurant, or in that restaurant’s parking lot.

The Ross Amendment was clearly intended as a “poison pill,” and was designed to create opposition to the bill. Nothing in the current law or in H 111 would require a permittee to answer the server. However, restaurant owners may have concerns regarding potential liability should they choose to not harass their patrons with intrusive personal questions. While the NRA remains in support of H 111, we will work to remove the Ross Amendment.

Please continue to contact your state Representative IMMEDIATELY and urge him or her to support H 111, and to support efforts to remove the Ross Amendment.