by September 1st has been set as the hearing date for Benson et al v. Chicago et al. This is the case supported by the NRA that challenges the new Chicago gun laws enacted after the McDonald case struck down the City of Chicago’s handgun ban.
Judge Ronald Guzman is the US District Court judge assigned to the case. He was appointed to the bench by Bill Clinton in 1999. He doesn’t get high marks from those that have rated him on the website The Robing Room. On a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being awful and 10 being excellent, he rates a 3.4.
Civil litigators in particular don’t seem to like him. From the comments:
He’s got to look for a job he really likes. He’s almost always late, is lazy, unreasonable, procrastinates and doesn’t care. He makes short-shrift of cases and looks for the easy way out–not very analytical. Has a very unlikeable and unpleasant attitude in court. – 2010
Agree with other comments. Judge Guzman is unlikeable and doesn’t always seem to catch on quickly. If you hate lawyers, why be a judge? – 2008
Judge Guzman is perpetually late to court and always in a grumpy mood. That said, he doesn’t seem to have any noticeable bias towards either side, because he equally despises them both. – 2006
I hope this isn’t a bad sign for Benson.
