NRA- ILA On Reporting Requirement

The NRA-ILA has responded to ATF’s proposed new reporting requirement for dealers in the SW.

BATFE Requests Comment Period Extension for Proposed Multiple Rifle Sales Reporting Rule

Friday, April 29, 2011

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives today republished its proposal to require firearm dealers to report multiple sales of various rifles. Compared to its initial request in December, which was rejected as an “emergency” request, the new notice clarifies that the proposed requirement would apply only to dealers in four southwestern states, and would apply only to semi-automatic rifles of a caliber greater than .22 (including .223) and that can use detachable magazines. The notice fails to address the NRA’s comments, which pointed out that the agency has no legal authority to demand this information.

The BATFE estimates that roughly 2,500 dealers would be required to file such reports, about one-third of all dealers in the four affected states, and compliance with the requirement would take the average dealer about 1.5 hours annually.

The BATFE says that comments should address whether the information in the reports would be useful and whether the BATFE correctly estimated the burden that a multiple sales reporting requirement would impose on dealers.

Given the information provided in the Wilson Center’s report, the answer to the question about the usefulness of the information would appear to be “no.” Comments may be faxed to oira_submission@OMB.eop.gov (note the underscore after “oira”) or faxed to 202-395-7285 until May 31. Disturbingly, the comments on the first proposal ran more than 2-1 in favor of this useless and unauthorized bureaucratic fishing trip; the new notice gives gun owners the opportunity to correct that situation.

– Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone


One thought on “NRA- ILA On Reporting Requirement”

  1. Actually they've only put an email alert out about it. The only NRA-ILA or NRA HQ person's name (that we know of from the FOIA) who has commented on the rifle registration scheme so far was Chris Cox. Certainly nobody on the board we could identify, nobody who writes for the magazines, etc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *