by For the last few days since Manchin-Toomey was defeated all we’ve heard is about the big bad NRA and the “gun lobby” as if it were some monolithic object. The other thing being bandied about by the gun prohibitionists is that the NRA leadership are merely tools of the gun manufacturers.
This is utter bullshit and we all know it.
An article I read within the last few days gave credit where credit is due – to you and me and everyone else in the trenches who wrote letters, made calls, talked to friends, and sent faxes. This same article pointed out that the leadership of the NRA responded to what they were hearing from the grass roots and not the other way around. If Wayne LaPierre is steadfast in opposition, it is because we have pushed him in that direction. As to the manufacturers, they respond to their consumers. A gun maker that supports gun control measures would lose their customer base a’la Smith and Wesson. I really wish I remembered where I read this article and I wish I had bookmarked it.
I think the statement by Chris Cox of the NRA-ILA is recognition that the strength of the NRA come from the grass roots. I think Chris is correct that the fight is not over.
While both sides in the gun control debate regroup after our victory in the Senate earlier this week, I want to give credit where credit is due. The credit for Wednesday’s defeat of gun control goes to the countless gun owners and other Americans who drew a line in the sand–who sent emails and letters and made phone calls to their U.S. senators, urging them to protect private firearm transfers, semi-automatic firearms, and the magazines that millions of Americans own for self-defense.
There is no question that you shocked the enemies of liberty two days ago. Going into Wednesday’s votes, they thought victory was within reach. Many in the media had pushed the idea that resistance to the gun control agenda was futile, and some of our more aggressive adversaries may have started to believe their own propaganda. I’m sure some had convinced themselves that the intensity of their anger toward gun owners was all that was necessary to assure victory.
But you and your fellow gun owners proved them wrong. As you know, the best Americans do what they have to do, not for personal praise, but because it’s the right thing to do. They do what has to be done not only for themselves, but for their fellow Americans today and for generations of Americans to come. Nevertheless, on behalf of all of us at NRA headquarters, I want to thank you for answering the call.
As you know, however, we can take only measured comfort from this week’s success. In his bitter response to the Senate’s votes, President Obama said that this fight is far from over, and that’s the one thing that he is right about.
Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), sponsor of the gun control bill debated this week, has promised to bring his bill up at a more opportune moment. Obama’s “Organizing for America,” billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s “Mayors Against Illegal Gun Guns,” and former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’ “Americans for Responsible Solutions” will focus their efforts on defeating pro-Second Amendment senators in 2014.
I say to those groups and their leaders, that pro-Second Amendment senators stood with us and we will stand with them, as we have with other elected representatives who have supported the Second Amendment before them.
Over the last generation, gun owners have had tremendous success advancing our cause. The refusal of the Obama administration and anti-gun radicals in Congress to attack us during Obama’s first term is a testament to our strength. They became emboldened by Obama’s reelection and over the last four months, we have weathered an anti-gun public relations campaign as severe as any we have experienced. And we have won the first legislative battle at the national level.
Our adversaries are well-funded, though, and as determined as any we have seen before. The fight ahead will be as difficult as this organization and the gun owning community has ever faced. Prepare for what’s ahead. Every gun owner will be needed on the team. Elected officials who support the Second Amendment will be subjected to a well-financed, cleverly conceived campaign designed to convince them that they are on the wrong side of history. Our job and yours will be to expose that claim for the fraud that it is. Please find strength in the knowledge that the victories best savored are those that are hardest fought, and encourage our friends in Congress to do the same.
Thank you for all you did to win this fight, and for your readiness to win the fights that will come.
John, the media and the pols tried to create another Dunblaine. And failed this time, thankfully. If there is one thing that people can do to change the balance of power is to make more shooters. Take your friends and your friends kids shooting – introduce them to the sport safely, whether its trap, hunting, falling plates, or whatever. Make more shooters!
@RKV: That is one of the best things we can do. The more we "innoculate" people from the gun prohibitionists' rhetoric, the better.
The Captains Journal .
We do have to give credit where it's due.
We MUST thank Reid and Obama. It was their fear of debate that made Reid use this format. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324493704578430672176449846.html?mod=WSJ_article_MoreIn_Opinion
A word, first, about that Senate "minority." Majority Leader Harry Reid was free to bring the deal struck by West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin and Pennsylvania Republican Pat Toomey to the floor for an up-or-down vote, and this background-checks amendment might have passed. It did convince 54 Senators, including four Republicans.
But under Senate rules, a simple majority vote would have opened the measure to up to 30 hours of debate, which would have meant inspecting the details. The White House demanded, and Mr. Reid agreed, that Congress should try to pass the amendment without such a debate.
Majority rules would have also opened the bill to pro-gun amendments that were likely to pass. That would have boxed Mr. Reid into the embarrassing spectacle of having to later scotch a final bill because it also contained provisions that the White House loathes. So Mr. Reid moved under "unanimous consent" to allow nine amendments, each with a 60-vote threshold.